The graph below shows the changes in maximum number of Asian elephants between 1994 and 2007.
The bar graph illustrates the estimated maximum population of elephants in a range of Asian countries in both 1997 and 2004.
In most of countries, the population for elephants fell amongst projected periods. The most interestingly, Malaysian elephant and Thailand elephant plunged in its population more than half the figure in 1997. In the former, the number of elephants dropped as low as 1000. Indian, on the other hand, remained the same as the largest population for elephants, but experienced of a dramatic fall in numbers so that in 2004, the number reached at 7500. The smallest population was China, as witnessed from the graph, its size was as small as 1000 elephants in 1997 and it dropped in half to as few as 500 elephants by 2004.
Although the trend is downward in overall, elephant populations were remained stable in Vietnam and Laos at approximately 1000. The only country where it shows a recovery trend in population in elephants was Cambodia where number has risen to around 1200.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-05-05 | kongminh113 | 73 | view |
- The pie charts below show the online sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013 64
- The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013 98
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 80
- The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990. 70
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year. 70
in both 1997 and 2004.
between 1997 and 2004.
flaws:
You lost 'srilanka'. Need to compare srilanka to Malaysian.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 8 10
No. of Words: 169 200
No. of Characters: 814 1000
No. of Different Words: 92 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.606 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.817 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.762 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 56 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 48 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 36 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 24 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.125 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.201 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.125 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.438 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.628 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.075 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4