Some countries achieve international success, building specialized sports facilities for top athletes to train instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use. Positive or negative?
Sports play an important role not only in making the human's body healthier but also enhancing social relationships. In many countries, the governments invest in professional facilities for elite athletes, thus, some critics claim that it is a waste of tax because it is helpless for the whole population’s health. I disagree with this view.
First of all, it is indispensable to using specialised sports facilities if one athlete wants to become world-class. For example, a professional swimmer cannot practice in a public swimming pool as it is crowded and the water is polluted. Only the specific pool can make him or her increase the swimming skills.
Secondly, better training facilities and scientific plan can help athletes have better performance in the international stages, and this will create a sense of patriotism. For example, every Olympic Games my family gets together to watch the matches, if athletes from our nation beat all the other players, we will all feel proud and love our country more.
Thirdly, international sports success also encourages citizens to exercise. For example, China is famous for their excellent table tennis performance. Many Chinese people have been watching these ping-pong players winning a number of medals over these years. As a result, this sport has become one of the most popular sport in the whole country.
However, a huge amount of investment in specialised facilities leads to fewer budgets in general ones. This may discourage general public to take part in sports. They have to pay extra money to visit commercial sports places rather than government-provided, low-cost ones.
In conclusion, to train elite athletes can bring up numerous benefits to the country, thus providing specialised sports facilities is worthy. But sports investment for the general public is also necessary.
- Some people think that dangerous sports should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement. Give the reason and relevant examples. 67
- Some countries achieve international success, building specialized sports facilities for top athletes to train instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use. Positive or negative? 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 38, Rule ID: IT_IS_JJ_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'use'?
Suggestion: use
... First of all, it is indispensable to using specialised sports facilities if one at...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 124, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ts in general ones. This may discourage general public to take part in sports. They have to pa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 173, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...s worthy. But sports investment for the general public is also necessary.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 207, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r the general public is also necessary.
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'third', 'thirdly', 'thus', 'for example', 'in conclusion', 'in general', 'as a result', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.256880733945 0.247107548796 104% => OK
Verbs: 0.140672782875 0.15552993741 90% => OK
Adjectives: 0.125382262997 0.0946569551029 132% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0519877675841 0.0501201869031 104% => OK
Pronouns: 0.039755351682 0.0437536398559 91% => OK
Prepositions: 0.103975535168 0.122223957237 85% => OK
Participles: 0.0336391437309 0.0403219363162 83% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.01949163029 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0305810397554 0.0326786765898 94% => OK
Particles: 0.00305810397554 0.00163938923432 187% => Too many particles.
Determiners: 0.0917431192661 0.0861751148067 106% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0214067278287 0.0214082191602 100% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0 0.0119246538136 0% => More subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, whom, Whose, That.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1861.0 1933.38276553 96% => OK
No of words: 292.0 316.052104208 92% => OK
Chars per words: 6.35153583618 6.10592293882 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20519365927 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.404109589041 0.37474360046 108% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.304794520548 0.284197041944 107% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.22602739726 0.203843217982 111% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.140410958904 0.137313986986 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01949163029 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626712328767 0.560935902166 112% => OK
Word variations: 71.7668610268 60.7401812628 118% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0911823647 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.1764705882 20.7725350517 83% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9364795821 49.5273876611 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.385113269 93.4120437189 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0647249191 15.2821509519 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.935275080906 0.594174754866 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.39078156313 137% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01102204409 80% => OK
Readability: 47.655922643 49.1922392462 97% => OK
Elegance: 1.69736842105 1.69127372897 100% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Topic essay coherence: 0.251936895648 0.332604825255 76% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.068578549896 0.102734651613 67% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.055702166009 0.0668474354756 83% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.526926101871 0.534917948617 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.157969055838 0.148666948902 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0890994785943 0.13441755203 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065569590843 0.0742828286743 88% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.200395852776 0.324241079732 62% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0587766577908 0.0640056729886 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147782597191 0.22793763319 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044383763489 0.0582452615562 76% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.68436873747 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.41883767535 58% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 5.88977955912 136% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.60220440882 77% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.00200400802 100% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 10.493987976 114% => OK
--------------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay E-rater: 6.5 Out of 9