Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Growing opportunities, a vast variety of businesses and a plethora of ways for people to be successful have emerged due to the increasing human needs and potential to explore more, learn more, do more, and get more out of everything that’s available. These things might sound like growth and development on all sides and corners of human society, but they have equally devious consequences regarding the way people evaluate success, and the extent to which they are ready to go to achieve it. They resort to illegal ways, scams, frauds etc to get what they need. People find loopholes in the existing laws and policies and take advantage of these shortcomings to satisfy their ever growing thirst of power and money.
In a way, scandals and scams serve a useful purpose of getting people’s attention towards certain issues that people otherwise ignore or can’t find. We can’t stop people from taking advantage if they find some way around certain things. But we sure can improve on those loopholes after we know they exist. Scandals bring these problems to light. If any speaker or reformer points out some flaw, it’s inveterate for people to ignore it unless there are consequences. There was this news last summer that facebook had cancelled the internship of a student because he hacked Zuckerberg’s account to prove that a flaw existed in the site’s codebase. Google resorted to server security only after it’s security had been breached and important user data had been lost. Had these incidents not happened, changes would not have been in effect to overcome these issues. These incidents have had some serious risks and losses though, but then they’ve helped in making the systems better and secure.
As scandals happen, people are always working on the edge to make their systems better and flaw-proof, so it enhances their abilities and keeps them alert to look for all possibilities where things can go south. Authorities also keep check on people so that they can’t commit frauds and scams and take advantage of the system. Imagine if there were no wrongdoers. What would the crime fighting people do? What would the FBI work on? Who would the police keep check on? There would be no need for any such authorities then, no need for any such law and order. The need for a solution arises only when there are problems. If there are no problems, then you don’t need to do anything. This marks a world that’s static, not moving, not doing anything.
It’s not appropriate to say that scandals are good or they must happen, but just that because they happen, they can been seen as opportunities of betterment and usefulness. There is a lot of risk involved and careers of people are at stake when big scandals happen. There was this problem with the ATM machines earlier, that when people didn’t collect money and if the cash went back in the machine, the amount would not be deducted from the user’s account balance. People took advantage, collected all cash but one note from the ATM, so that when it went back inside, their balance remained what it was before. This caused a huge loss for the banks and they had to remove this facility. So, it incurred loss to a lot of people, but it pointed out a major flaw in the way ATM machines operated. This way, scandals prove to be useful.
Conclusively, there are good and bad sides to everything. Scandals cause a lot of loss to people and affect their careers, investments, and privacy. But sometimes they turn the attention of people on important issues and flaws that are otherwise not taken seriously. Some of these issues can cause widespread losses and can have a domino effect on nations and the economy as a whole, so it’s important that they are taken care of before they reach such a level to affect the society in such a widespread manner. Scandals do get the attention of relevant people who need to take measures to make ends meet and resolve issues. Thus, in a way, they are important.
- The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries. 70
- "A recent study rating 300 male and female Mentian advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep the executives need and the success of their firms. Of the advertisin 70
- "Recently, butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. This change, however, has had little impact on our customers. In fact, only about 2 percent of customers have complained, indica 62
- The increasingly rapid pace of life today causes more problems than it solves. 83
- Students should always question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 8, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Growing opportunities, a vast variety of busines...
^^
Line 7, column 113, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[4]
Message: Did you mean 'can be' or 'has been'?
Suggestion: can be; has been
...but just that because they happen, they can been seen as opportunities of betterment and...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 299, Rule ID: ATM_MACHINE[2]
Message: This phrase is redundant ('M' stands for 'machine'). Use simply 'ATMs'.
Suggestion: ATMs
...happen. There was this problem with the ATM machines earlier, that when people didn’t collec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 773, Rule ID: ATM_MACHINE[2]
Message: This phrase is redundant ('M' stands for 'machine'). Use simply 'ATMs'.
Suggestion: ATMs
... it pointed out a major flaw in the way ATM machines operated. This way, scandals prove to b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'look', 'regarding', 'so', 'then', 'thus']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.241743725231 0.240241500013 101% => OK
Verbs: 0.183619550859 0.157235817809 117% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0607661822985 0.0880659088768 69% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0449141347424 0.0497285424764 90% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0435931307794 0.0444667217837 98% => OK
Prepositions: 0.101717305152 0.12292977631 83% => OK
Participles: 0.0356671070013 0.0406280797675 88% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.47139711307 2.79330140395 88% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0343461030383 0.030933414821 111% => OK
Particles: 0.00264200792602 0.0016655270985 159% => OK
Determiners: 0.0937912813738 0.0997080785238 94% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0171730515192 0.0249443105267 69% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0171730515192 0.0148568991511 116% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3994.0 2732.02544248 146% => OK
No of words: 687.0 452.878318584 152% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.81368267831 6.0361032391 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.11963717896 4.58838876751 112% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.336244541485 0.366273622748 92% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.238719068413 0.280924506359 85% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.151382823872 0.200843997647 75% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0887918486172 0.132149295362 67% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47139711307 2.79330140395 88% => OK
Unique words: 322.0 219.290929204 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468704512373 0.48968727796 96% => OK
Word variations: 59.517283596 55.4138127331 107% => OK
How many sentences: 36.0 20.6194690265 175% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0833333333 23.380412469 82% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.3369638336 59.4972553346 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.944444444 141.124799967 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0833333333 23.380412469 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.222222222222 0.674092028746 33% => More Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.21349557522 77% => OK
Readability: 42.9552401747 51.4728631049 83% => OK
Elegance: 1.3932038835 1.64882698954 84% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192548662238 0.391690518653 49% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.128815501258 0.123202303941 105% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0954801361788 0.077325440228 123% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.413390074208 0.547984918172 75% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.138038027978 0.149214159877 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679700809072 0.161403998019 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476888906147 0.0892212321368 53% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.363252251651 0.385218514788 94% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0527894386848 0.0692045440612 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132434596768 0.275328986314 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033321006954 0.0653680567796 51% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.4325221239 125% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 18.0 5.30420353982 339% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88274336283 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 7.22455752212 138% => OK
Negative topic words: 16.0 3.66592920354 436% => Less negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 29.0 13.5995575221 213% => OK
---------------------
It is not right on the topic from the view of e-grader.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.