Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The food we ate in the past was healthier than the food we eat today.
As some people may hold the view that todays' eating habit is healthier than the past's diet; however, some others may take an opposite viewpoint and believe that the past time's food were healthy. I personally agree with the second belief. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons which persuade me to put forward this perspective.
The first exquisite reasons which advocates my idea is the hectic lifestyle and its negative effects on the people's eating habits. It is lucidly obvious that nowadays the people have the high tempo lifestyle, they are in rush to suite with this speed. This fast tempo forces them to sacrifice their individual stuffs such as social communication, and dining. They mostly prefer to spend fewer hours for the preparation and eating food. Mostly, the unhealthy food such as a fast food, which contains the huge amount of fats and low value of nutrition, is a decent option for this situation. Consequently, this eating habit paves the path to the serious health issues.
The second reason is the proliferation of the fast food restaurants. As it mentioned above the fast food is named as one of the unhealthy meal choices; however, there are the bulks of the fast food restaurants with various and attractive campaigns which appeal the people to eat the junk food. In this case, the fast foods have the priority in the people's selection. According to the noteworthy intelligible research conducted in my country, in Tehran the availability of the fast food restaurants in the city is sixty percent more than the traditional food restaurant. Hence, the chance of choosing the unhealthy fast foods is 1.6 fold more than the healthy traditional foods.
The last reason which confirms the accuracy of my perspective is that the manufacturing process which lead to unhealthy food option. Unfortunately, based upon the population expansion and their huge demand for the food sources, there are an undeniable requirement to the industrial usage in the food sector. In the food manufacturing there is a list of chemical substances used to preserve the food for long duration; however, they contain lots of the negative sides-effects. So these substances lead to the lot of health issues.
To wrap it up, all aforementioned reasons and examples lead to the conclusion that nowadays the people possess unhealthy eating habits in comparison with the past diet
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-23 | SHAHRIYAR | 73 | view |
| 2018-09-30 | emadifahimeh@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2018-08-24 | zabanfinish | 70 | view |
| 2018-08-24 | zabanfinish | 70 | view |
| 2018-08-24 | zabanfinish | 70 | view |
- tpo 34-integ 80
- 9.The following appeared in a health newsletter."A ten-year nationwide study of the effectiveness of wearing a helmet while bicycling indicates that ten years ago, approximately 35 percent of all bicyclists reported wearing helmets, whereas today that num 46
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- 1.The following appeared as part of an article in a business magazine."A recent study rating 300 male and female Mentian advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep 49
- tpo15 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 349, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...the fast foods have the priority in the peoples selection. According to the noteworthy ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 253, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'requirements'?
Suggestion: requirements
...e food sources, there are an undeniable requirement to the industrial usage in the food sec...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['consequently', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.259770114943 0.229887763892 113% => OK
Verbs: 0.128735632184 0.158761421928 81% => OK
Adjectives: 0.12183908046 0.0866891130778 141% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0275862068966 0.046263068375 60% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0367816091954 0.0685040099705 54% => OK
Prepositions: 0.103448275862 0.118717715034 87% => OK
Participles: 0.0252873563218 0.0351676179071 72% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.80657652598 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0298850574713 0.0309702414327 96% => OK
Particles: 0.00229885057471 0.00188951952338 122% => OK
Determiners: 0.149425287356 0.0887237588012 168% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00689655172414 0.0209618222197 33% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0183908045977 0.0139019557991 132% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2419.0 2387.08602151 101% => OK
No of words: 398.0 408.028673835 98% => OK
Chars per words: 6.07788944724 5.86048508987 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.48200974243 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.341708542714 0.338922669872 101% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.256281407035 0.251872472559 102% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.193467336683 0.174417080927 111% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.138190954774 0.112833075102 122% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80657652598 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51256281407 0.524397521467 98% => OK
Word variations: 56.5628983953 59.2087087015 96% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6684587814 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.9473684211 20.5533526081 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7644890525 48.84282405 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.315789474 120.699889404 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9473684211 20.5533526081 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.473684210526 0.644075263715 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.54480286738 36% => OK
Readability: 46.5755091246 45.7405998639 102% => OK
Elegance: 2.0119047619 1.45489161554 138% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.500704939838 0.300154397459 167% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.147734617683 0.103427244359 143% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0908045470724 0.0752933317313 121% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.63886450379 0.497263757937 128% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.164858876459 0.151897553556 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.251048578176 0.114077575197 220% => Sentence topic similarity is too high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0968642755041 0.0781384742642 124% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.498585485686 0.336927656856 148% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.117977258169 0.067059652881 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.361415875255 0.210909579961 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.078152316328 0.0618886996521 126% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8870967742 42% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.86379928315 207% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.91756272401 122% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 8.42114695341 59% => OK
Negative topic words: 7.0 2.4623655914 284% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.75985663082 145% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.6433691756 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.