tpo4
The text and lecturer offer two opposing views on the accuracy of the hypothesis which illustrate reasons of endotherms dinosaurs. While the text lists some points such as the fossils of the polar region, leg position and movement capability, and Haversian canals as the reasons which advocate this surmise, the lecturer counters these specific points and presents some clues to call into question for the information in the reading passage.
First of all, professor refutes the polar dinosaurs’ fossil as the evidence of endothermy which in the reading part is named as one of the main reasons. The text mentions that since the frigid climate of the polar reign demands endotherms, which are able to adjust their body temperature with surrounding, thus the dinosaurs are endotherms. The lecturer states that the temperature of polar region was not as cold as today; in contrast, it was warmer which the dinosaur can exist on that condition. Besides, whenever, the temperature dropped they migrated to warmer areas or hibernate as the reptiles.
Next, the passage uses the surmise of leg position as one of the clues for this hypothesis. Inasmuch as the legs were underneath the body which makes them run. The lecturer doubts the truth of this claim. As she asserts there is no any evidence about their ability to run; moreover, the fact which should not be underestimated is their heavyweights. Thus, the legs' size and standing mainly are for the sake of balance of the dinosaurs and not running.
Finally, the professor argues that the Haversian canals as the hints of endothermy. Meanwhile, the passage presumes that these canals are specific for the endotherms and they assist them to grow fast and consist in any climatical condition. In addition, their bones have these canals; as a result, they are endotherms. Based on the lecturer's evidence which is based on the growth rings, the pattern of growth in these dinosaurs is not persisted. There is fluctuation in the rings' size which illustrates the dinosaurs' growth rely on climatic condition. Consequently, they cannot consider as endotherms.
The professor effectively challenges the claim made in the article
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-05 | tststs | 80 | view |
| 2023-06-09 | Zmx_6 | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 80 | view |
| 2023-01-12 | theprasad | 70 | view |
- TPO-Extra 2-integrated 3
- The following is part of a memorandum from the president of Humana University."Last year the number of students who enrolled in online degree programs offered by nearby Omni University increased by 50 percent. During the same year, Omni showed a sign 90
- tpo28 60
- tpo 23 75
- Some people believe that scientific discoveries have given us a much better understanding of the world around us. Others believe that science has revealed to us that the world is infinitely more complex than we ever realized.Write a response in which you 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 230, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
... of this claim. As she asserts there is no any evidence about their ability to run...
^^
Line 7, column 508, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'dinosaurs'' or 'dinosaur's'?
Suggestion: dinosaurs'; dinosaur's
...in the rings size which illustrates the dinosaurs growth rely on climatic condition. Cons...
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'consequently', 'finally', 'first', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'thus', 'while', 'as to', 'in addition', 'in contrast', 'such as', 'as a result', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.277353689567 0.261695866417 106% => OK
Verbs: 0.134860050891 0.158904122519 85% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0483460559796 0.0723426182421 67% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0381679389313 0.0435111971325 88% => OK
Pronouns: 0.030534351145 0.0277247811725 110% => OK
Prepositions: 0.134860050891 0.128828473217 105% => OK
Participles: 0.0254452926209 0.0370669169778 69% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.75649045893 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0127226463104 0.0208969081088 61% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.157760814249 0.128158765124 123% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00763358778626 0.0158828679856 48% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0254452926209 0.0114777025283 222% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2178.0 1645.83664459 132% => OK
No of words: 354.0 271.125827815 131% => OK
Chars per words: 6.15254237288 6.08160592843 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.04852973271 107% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.35593220339 0.374372842146 95% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.28813559322 0.287516216867 100% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.228813559322 0.187439937562 122% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.138418079096 0.113142543107 122% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75649045893 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 145.348785872 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497175141243 0.539623497131 92% => OK
Word variations: 52.175589087 53.8517498576 97% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0529801325 138% => OK
Sentence length: 19.6666666667 21.7502111507 90% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.7437696851 49.3711431718 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 132.220823453 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 21.7502111507 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.833333333333 0.878197800319 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 48.4802259887 50.5018328374 96% => OK
Elegance: 2.15 1.90840788429 113% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.549887131256 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.144498061153 0.142949733639 101% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.110478175804 0.0787303798458 140% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.62534003391 0.631733273073 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.176086582607 0.139662658121 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.266732575781 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.103435571967 0% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.511666341696 0.414875509568 123% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0838373968573 0.0530846634433 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.40443939384 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0528353158467 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.26048565121 235% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.49668874172 143% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.62251655629 28% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 7.0 3.1766004415 220% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 10.2958057395 126% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.