Should a city try to preserve its old, historic building or destroy them and replace them with modern building?
Modernization has resulted in rapid expansion of cities, which has left its heritage and culture behind. Day in day out new commercial complexes and other buildings are coming up in the place of older buildings. Sometimes historically significant building have been demolished to build new structures. Bearing this fact in mind a question that is a matter of debate a controversial one is whether a city should keep its old fashion houses and building or replace them by modern structures. Agreement is yet to be reached on this issue; however, I am personally on the belief that historic buildings are infrastructures of every city, which destroy them can destroy tissue of city. In the following paragraph, I will pinpoint the most outstanding reasons.
One compelling reason, lending credence to the stance taken above is that we all know that old fashion building play a pivotal role in identity of city. Therefore, there are vast majorities of paramount information behind them, which can be effective in order to identify history of the town. Scientifically speaking, in all around the world there are many historical cities, which old structures consist their tissue and known as heritage of past generation. In fact, not only are this heritage valuable for people but also many traditions and customs are behind them that can patronize people to learn about their previous generations. Delving further into the issue reveal that our history is our knowledge and power without which or lives seems to be paralyzed. Indeed, not only should we preserve historical building and restore them but also should respect to them. A noteworthy refreshingly intelligible statistic revealed by recent social research conducted in our country; show that cities which preserved their historical places such as building, not only do provided their people with a great opportunity to understand their generation but also adds to the beauty of the city.
Another reason that is equally important if not more is that preserving historical structures not only can attract tourists but also can develop economical situation. Broadly speaking, crowds of people in all corner of world are interested in traditional structures and make an effort to get acquaintance with various culture from past generation. Indeed, historical places provide fertile ground for tourists to get familiar with history. To put it in other word, tourists not only can improve the importance of heritage of a city but also can improve economic with substantial amount of money they spend. However, what I alluded to above cannot be overgeneralized to all contexts. Alongside with the innumerable benefits it has, indisputably, nowadays with the expansion of population, people need more space. In fact, preserving traditional houses may run people into a huge problems especially during earthquake. As a matter of fact building modern structures not only can meet people's needs but also can improve the view of city with imposing structures. Nevertheless, it does not make those preceding benefits pale.
To wrap it up, there are many different view point when it comes to preserving old-fashion house or not. Contemplating all the aforementioned reason one soon realize that many useful information are behind the historic structures, which can help people understand themselves better. Additionally, traditional structures can appeal crowds of tourists to the city and develop economic condition. I highly suggest that we should try to save our historical places because of many advantages they have. If we do not reverse such a trend, we will soon lose our originality and authenticity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-07-24 | amirbahman | 86 | view |
- Some people like to do only what they do already do well. Other people prefer to try new things and take risks. Which do you prefer? 73
- TPO 37 3
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and su 66
- "Recently, we signed a contract with the Fly-Away Pest Control Company to provide pest control services at our warehouse in Palm City, but last month we discovered that over $20,000 worth of food there had been destroyed by pest damage. Meanwhile, the Buz 59
- The citizens of Forsythe have adopted more healthful lifestyles Their responses to a recent survey show that in their eating habits they conform more closely to government nutritional recommendations than they did ten years ago Furthermore there has been 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 146, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...n attract tourists but also can develop economical situation. Broadly speaking, crowds of ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 879, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'problem'?
Suggestion: problem
...ional houses may run people into a huge problems especially during earthquake. As a matt...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 26, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...efits pale. To wrap it up, there are many different view point when it comes to preserving ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 172, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun information seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much useful information', 'a good deal of useful information'.
Suggestion: much useful information; a good deal of useful information
...ementioned reason one soon realize that many useful information are behind the historic structures, whi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 586, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... lose our originality and authenticity.
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'broadly speaking', 'in fact', 'such as', 'as a matter of fact']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.220472440945 0.229887763892 96% => OK
Verbs: 0.165354330709 0.158761421928 104% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0992125984252 0.0866891130778 114% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0740157480315 0.046263068375 160% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0551181102362 0.0685040099705 80% => OK
Prepositions: 0.116535433071 0.118717715034 98% => OK
Participles: 0.0409448818898 0.0351676179071 116% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.97059509126 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0283464566929 0.0309702414327 92% => OK
Particles: 0.00314960629921 0.00188951952338 167% => OK
Determiners: 0.0614173228346 0.0887237588012 69% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0299212598425 0.0209618222197 143% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0188976377953 0.0139019557991 136% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3662.0 2387.08602151 153% => OK
No of words: 580.0 408.028673835 142% => OK
Chars per words: 6.31379310345 5.86048508987 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.90746259869 4.48200974243 109% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.401724137931 0.338922669872 119% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.312068965517 0.251872472559 124% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.23275862069 0.174417080927 133% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.163793103448 0.112833075102 145% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97059509126 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 290.0 212.727598566 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524397521467 95% => OK
Word variations: 61.5387159017 59.2087087015 104% => OK
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6684587814 131% => OK
Sentence length: 21.4814814815 20.5533526081 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7436702159 48.84282405 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.62962963 120.699889404 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4814814815 20.5533526081 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.481481481481 0.644075263715 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.54480286738 90% => OK
Readability: 52.6883780332 45.7405998639 115% => OK
Elegance: 1.28342245989 1.45489161554 88% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259549744455 0.300154397459 86% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.075349025889 0.103427244359 73% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.048097922357 0.0752933317313 64% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.406717395301 0.497263757937 82% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.117829618103 0.151897553556 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.082481376744 0.114077575197 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0818699022506 0.0781384742642 105% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.38551517993 0.336927656856 114% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0444921086971 0.067059652881 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179262414873 0.210909579961 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663154386647 0.0618886996521 107% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8870967742 109% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.86379928315 155% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.91756272401 163% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 8.42114695341 107% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 2.4623655914 203% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.75985663082 181% => OK
Total topic words: 19.0 13.6433691756 139% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.