tpo13
The author and lecturer offer two opposing views on the effect of fossil purchasing by the private ownership. While the reading part lists some reasons as the main dangerous factors of this incident, the professor counters these specific points. She presents some clues to call into the question for the information in the text.
First of all, the lecturer refutes the fact that the public will be restricted to access these fossils; inasmuch as, a specific individual is the owner of fossils. This point is named as of the disadvantages of this event in the text. However, the lecturer states that these purchases do not decrease the people's access to these fossils; on the other hand, it presents a wider opportunity for the people. Since the museums’ limited budget cannot be responsible for the updating the new and unique type of fossils.
Next, the passage uses the fact that the scientists will lose their approach as one of the fundamental risks of this event. The lecturer doubts the truth of this claim. As she asserts, the values of fossils are indicated by the scientific examination. This examination is applied by the scientists, in this condition, if they find a rare fossil with proliferated evidence; they will not allow selling it. That how she casts doubt on the accuracy of this factor.
Finally, the professor argues that the fossils are in the threat of damages, while the wealthy commercial buyers do have no adequate information about their conservations. Meanwhile, the text portrays this situation as one of the drawbacks. Based on the lecturer's evidence, by buying the fossils, more substances are unearthed and the affluent data about their lives are available. In the comparison of the few unearthed fossil with the insufficient amount of information about their lives, these damages can be neglected.
The professor effectively challenges the claim made in the article.
Discourse Markers used:
['finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'while', 'first of all', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.259259259259 0.261695866417 99% => OK
Verbs: 0.122507122507 0.158904122519 77% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0712250712251 0.0723426182421 98% => OK
Adverbs: 0.022792022792 0.0435111971325 52% => OK
Pronouns: 0.031339031339 0.0277247811725 113% => OK
Prepositions: 0.153846153846 0.128828473217 119% => OK
Participles: 0.034188034188 0.0370669169778 92% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.78750904746 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00854700854701 0.0208969081088 41% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.190883190883 0.128158765124 149% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.014245014245 0.0158828679856 90% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.002849002849 0.0114777025283 25% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1915.0 1645.83664459 116% => OK
No of words: 312.0 271.125827815 115% => OK
Chars per words: 6.13782051282 6.08160592843 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.04852973271 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.355769230769 0.374372842146 95% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.285256410256 0.287516216867 99% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.230769230769 0.187439937562 123% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.137820512821 0.113142543107 122% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78750904746 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548076923077 0.539623497131 102% => OK
Word variations: 57.6715347544 53.8517498576 107% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0529801325 130% => OK
Sentence length: 18.3529411765 21.7502111507 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7639843752 49.3711431718 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.647058824 132.220823453 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3529411765 21.7502111507 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.470588235294 0.878197800319 54% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 46.8785822021 50.5018328374 93% => OK
Elegance: 2.53225806452 1.90840788429 133% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.646435581456 0.549887131256 118% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.117703259298 0.142949733639 82% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0492320733821 0.0787303798458 63% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.684507151668 0.631733273073 108% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.116369589665 0.139662658121 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.328903902148 0.266732575781 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0793957068083 0.103435571967 77% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.553520464972 0.414875509568 133% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0609312300656 0.0530846634433 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.468087761719 0.40443939384 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0943808750825 0.0528353158467 179% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.49668874172 114% => OK
Negative topic words: 7.0 3.62251655629 193% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.1766004415 63% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 10.2958057395 126% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.