Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at a young age.
As some people may hold a view that the children’s financial management abilities do not relate to their future monetary accountabilities. However, others may take an opposite viewpoint and believe that this ability can be a financial responsible of the young children's future life. I personally agree with the second belief. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons which persuade me to put forward this perspective.
The first reason which gives the adherence to my outlook is that the habit earn in the childhood will endure for a long duration. It is lucidly obvious that majority of the individual's manners are shaped based on his or her habits. Moreover, a custom gained in the youth span is constructed a person's fundament feature. The management of money is not exceptional from this fact too. If a teenager gets aware of the money's essential status and the skill of administration of it in his or her young age, he or she will contain to follow this habit in his or her future life. In this condition, his or her brilliant life from the financial aspect is guaranteed.
The next case embraced my idea is that the controlling of money from the young age is a decent experience. It is explicit as a crystal that the complexity of an individual's interaction with her or his surrounding broads as he or she gets older. Indeed, by the petty practices at the simple level of interaction, a young person warranties his or her future success. For instance, if a ten years old boy informs about the money management, he will have fewer worries about the monetary issues in his future life. According to the noteworthy and intelligent survey conducted in my country, approximately sixty-nine percent of the successful businessmen in Tehran learned the financial handling from their age of 13.
The last indicator of my viewpoint's accuracy is that this management trains the children the balance among the supply and demand. As the children are growing up in the facilitated atmosphere where all their requirements are immediately addressed by their parents; they have no idea about the definition of supply and demand; in addition, the feasibility of intolerance among these two factors. They assume that the infinite source is accountable of their demands. However, it fairly contradicts with the reality. As a result, the opportunity for management in their childhood is a sound solution. A vivid example can be given to shed a light on the subject is my brother's example. He grows up with the train about the economic and its value from his youth ages; on the other hand, I grow up with the accessibility of my all demands without the consideration of the money's importance. Therefore, now he has more successful life in comparison of my life.
To wrap it up, based on the all aforementioned reasons, one can logically draw the conclusion that the ability of money management from the childhood is a sufficient way to address his or her successful future life. Since it provides a long-lasting habit, it is good experiences for their future life, and it teaches the stability of supply and demand.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Most businesspeople are motivated only by the desire for more money 80
- 1.Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well-being of the societies and environments in which they operate. Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations, provided they operate within the law, is to make 50
- 1.Some people argue that successful leaders in government, industry, or other fields must be highly competitive. Other people claim that in order to be successful, a leader must be willing and able to cooperate with others.Write a response in which you di 66
- In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In dev 16
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear. 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 294, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ined in the youth span is constructed a persons fundament feature. The management of mo...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 162, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
... as a crystal that the complexity of an individuals interaction with her or his surrounding...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 866, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'moneys'' or 'money's'?
Suggestion: moneys'; money's
...emands without the consideration of the moneys importance. Therefore, now he has more ...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'moreover', 'second', 'so', 'therefore', 'for instance', 'in addition', 'as a result', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.239242685026 0.229887763892 104% => OK
Verbs: 0.110154905336 0.158761421928 69% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0963855421687 0.0866891130778 111% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0275387263339 0.046263068375 60% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0895008605852 0.0685040099705 131% => OK
Prepositions: 0.13769363167 0.118717715034 116% => OK
Participles: 0.0223752151463 0.0351676179071 64% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.00199530181 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Infinitives: 0.013769363167 0.0309702414327 44% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.00688468158348 0.00188951952338 364% => OK
Determiners: 0.134251290878 0.0887237588012 151% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0154905335628 0.0209618222197 74% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00516351118761 0.0139019557991 37% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3150.0 2387.08602151 132% => OK
No of words: 530.0 408.028673835 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.94339622642 5.86048508987 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79809637944 4.48200974243 107% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.335849056604 0.338922669872 99% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.266037735849 0.251872472559 106% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.207547169811 0.174417080927 119% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.156603773585 0.112833075102 139% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00199530181 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 212.727598566 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494339622642 0.524397521467 94% => OK
Word variations: 58.9320075332 59.2087087015 100% => OK
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6684587814 121% => OK
Sentence length: 21.2 20.5533526081 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7905977336 48.84282405 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 120.699889404 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 20.5533526081 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.52 0.644075263715 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.54480286738 54% => OK
Readability: 47.8037735849 45.7405998639 105% => OK
Elegance: 1.75757575758 1.45489161554 121% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237566648272 0.300154397459 79% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0989502955528 0.103427244359 96% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0739902314905 0.0752933317313 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.52802988404 0.497263757937 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.140379147875 0.151897553556 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0975060266695 0.114077575197 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403264901132 0.0781384742642 52% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.512730465269 0.336927656856 152% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.115931355392 0.067059652881 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177492131751 0.210909579961 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0297596590747 0.0618886996521 48% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8870967742 109% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.86379928315 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.91756272401 163% => OK
Positive topic words: 11.0 8.42114695341 131% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.4623655914 122% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.75985663082 181% => OK
Total topic words: 19.0 13.6433691756 139% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.