"Of the two leading real estate firms in our town—Adams Realty and Fitch Realty—Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom work only part-time. Moreover, Adams' revenue last year was twice as high as that of Fitch and included home sales that averaged $168,000, compared to Fitch's $144,000. Homes listed with Adams sell faster as well: ten years ago I listed my home with Fitch, and it took more than four months to sell; last year, when I sold another home, I listed it with Adams, and it took only one month. Thus, if you want to sell your home quickly and at a good price, you should use Adams Realty."
Argument states that Adams Realty is better than Fitch Realty for selling home quickly and at a good price because Adams realty has 40 real estate agents and fitch has 25, many of them work part time. Adams’ last year was twice as high as Fitch, included home sales that averaged $168,000 and Fitch’s $144,000. There are many assumptions in the argument, which can make argument weak if proves false. No evidence provided in the argument that home can be sold with adams at good price. Whether Adams real estate agents are part time or full time. Fitch’s last year avenue is including or excluding home sales and $168000 is not double of $144000. How long it will take for Adams to sell a home ten years back and how long it is taking now for Fitch to sell a home.
First assumption is that, if Adam’s can sell home quickly, it means that they can sell home at good price. There is no comparison about selling price of home between two firms. There could be a possibility that Fitch realty is doing more price negotiation to get good price for customer. They might be getting customer who can buy home but not giving price which seller is expecting. There could be another possibility that Fitch firm has spacility in certain type of homes for example single family homes and adams have spacility in selling other type of homes for example big homes.
Argument also assumes that Adams firm has 40 real estate agents and Fitch has only 25, which is making adams better than fitch. There is no data presented in the argument that 40 real estate agents of Adams are part time or full time. Can all the agents sell home better than Fitch agents. Are all the agents working on selling home only, there might be possibility that out of 40 only few are working on selling homes, others might be working on administration work. May be all the 40 agents are not good. May be Fitch’s all the 25 agents are working on selling homes and working on selling homes.
Another assumption is that Adams’ revenue last year revenue was twice as high as Fitch, which makes it better than Fitch. Numbers given in argument are $168000 for Adams including home sales and $144000 for Fitch. According of numbers $168000 doesn’t look twice of $144000. There is no information that $144000 income of Fitch is including or excluding home sales.
In the argument, it is mentioned that ten years back it took four months for Fitch to sell a home and now t took less than one month for Adams to sell a home. There is no information in the argument that ten years back how long it was taking for Adams to sell and home and how long it is taking now for Fitch to sell a home.
If any of the assumptions become false, it can make argument weak. Data about selling time of a home is only for only home. To decide which firm is good more current data is needed about selling time of home and data about spacility in selling home types and areas where Adams are more known for selling homes and where Fitchs are more famous for selling homes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | sapana | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | stevewang1007 | 79 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | siirsalvador | 75 | view |
| 2019-09-17 | suhas201227 | 83 | view |
| 2019-09-09 | mehdi2020 | 63 | view |
- The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 50
- Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and suppo 83
- Those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism others may express, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy. 58
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 34
- Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated. 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 191, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...nts and fitch has 25, many of them work part time. Adams' last year was twice as hig...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 530, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...e. Whether Adams real estate agents are part time or full time. Fitch's last year av...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 543, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...ams real estate agents are part time or full time. Fitch's last year avenue is inclu...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 212, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...that 40 real estate agents of Adams are part time or full time. Can all the agents sell h...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 225, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...estate agents of Adams are part time or full time. Can all the agents sell home better th...
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'so', 'for example']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.281758957655 0.25644967241 110% => OK
Verbs: 0.182410423453 0.15541462614 117% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0684039087948 0.0836205057962 82% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0439739413681 0.0520304965353 85% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0195439739414 0.0272364105082 72% => OK
Prepositions: 0.118892508143 0.125424944231 95% => OK
Participles: 0.0602605863192 0.0416121511921 145% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.20882976384 2.79052419416 79% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0130293159609 0.026700313972 49% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.042345276873 0.113004496875 37% => Some determiners wanted.
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0211726384365 0.0255425247493 83% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0260586319218 0.0127820249294 204% => Maybe 'Which' is overused. If other WH_determiners like 'Who, What, Whom, Whose...' are used too in sentences, then there are no issues.
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3036.0 2731.13054187 111% => OK
No of words: 550.0 446.07635468 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52 6.12365571057 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84273464058 4.57801047555 106% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.256363636364 0.378187486979 68% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.150909090909 0.287650121315 52% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.0872727272727 0.208842608468 42% => More words length more than 7 chars wanted.
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0618181818182 0.135150697306 46% => More words length more than 8 chars wanted.
Word Length SD: 2.20882976384 2.79052419416 79% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 207.018472906 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.332727272727 0.469332199767 71% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 39.2517697516 52.1807786196 75% => OK
How many sentences: 27.0 20.039408867 135% => OK
Sentence length: 20.3703703704 23.2022227129 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2627400608 57.7814097925 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.444444444 141.986410481 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3703703704 23.2022227129 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.296296296296 0.724660767414 41% => More Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.14285714286 117% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 3.58251231527 140% => OK
Readability: 35.4612794613 51.9672348444 68% => OK
Elegance: 1.87417218543 1.8405768891 102% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374476461822 0.441005458295 85% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.159276817816 0.135418324435 118% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.123824469328 0.0829849096947 149% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.517244941899 0.58762219726 88% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.167939483151 0.147661913831 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14252654199 0.193483328276 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109157487644 0.0970749176394 112% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.274419408205 0.42659136922 64% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0606066211635 0.0774707102158 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234789640002 0.312017818177 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116162342278 0.0698173142475 166% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.33743842365 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 6.87684729064 160% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.82512315271 166% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 6.46551724138 108% => OK
Negative topic words: 10.0 5.36822660099 186% => OK
Neutral topic words: 8.0 2.82389162562 283% => OK
Total topic words: 25.0 14.657635468 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.