integrated writing
Both reading and lecture try to discuss a portrait’s subject. In the reading section, the writer contends that the claim of Austen's family which mentioned the portrait’s subject of a teenage girl was Austen is acceptable and he provides three reasons for support; however, the professor casts doubts on the reading points by indicating that the evidence of connection between portrait and Austen is not convinced. Accordingly, he brings some evidence to refute the reading's reasons.
First of all, the writer claims that after a century, Austen's family has confirmed the portrait is related to Jane Austen and permit to use her portrait in her letters; in contrast the professor rejects this notion by stating that when her family authorized the portrait, Austen almost had dead 70 years ago and they have never seen her so they could not talk certainly about if the portrait was for her or not.
Moreover, the reading passage holds the view that the portrait's features are as similar as Cassandra's sketch such as eyebrows, nose, and mouth and so forth; on the contrary, the lecturer underlines the fact that at the relevant period of time, her extended family has a lot of teenagers. Also, he points out, experts believe the true subject of the portrait is one of Austen's relatives, Mary Campion, who was Austen's niece.
In addition, the writer mentions that since the style of the portrait is related to Osiers Humphrey and he worked when Austen was teenager, the portrait's subject is Austen; conversely, the professor indicates that evidence points the portrait is related later date because the stamp on the back of the picture, blank canvas, demonstrated that it sold by William Lag who did not sell canvas on london when Austen was a teenage and it was used when she was older.
- Do you agree or disagree with following statement? Games are as important for adults as they are for children. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- People work because they need money to live. What are some other reasons that people work? Discuss one or more of these reasons. Use specific examples and details to support your answer. 73
- integrated 46 63
- People who develop different skills are more successful than people who develop one skill only. 70
- Do you agree to plan a course for university students: "Speaking in front of public" 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 134, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'using'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'permit' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: using
...it is related to Jane Austen and permit to use her portrait in her letters; in contras...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 229, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...nderlines the fact that at the relevant period of time, her extended family has a lot of teena...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['accordingly', 'also', 'conversely', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'as for', 'in addition', 'in contrast', 'such as', 'first of all', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.293255131965 0.261695866417 112% => OK
Verbs: 0.146627565982 0.158904122519 92% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0351906158358 0.0723426182421 49% => Some adjectives wanted.
Adverbs: 0.058651026393 0.0435111971325 135% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0439882697947 0.0277247811725 159% => OK
Prepositions: 0.114369501466 0.128828473217 89% => OK
Participles: 0.0263929618768 0.0370669169778 71% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.60383042798 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0146627565982 0.0208969081088 70% => OK
Particles: 0.00293255131965 0.00154638098197 190% => OK
Determiners: 0.114369501466 0.128158765124 89% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00293255131965 0.0158828679856 18% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0263929618768 0.0114777025283 230% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1797.0 1645.83664459 109% => OK
No of words: 302.0 271.125827815 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.95033112583 6.08160592843 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.04852973271 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.397350993377 0.374372842146 106% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.291390728477 0.287516216867 101% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.192052980132 0.187439937562 102% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0960264900662 0.113142543107 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60383042798 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 145.348785872 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539735099338 0.539623497131 100% => OK
Word variations: 55.6849736404 53.8517498576 103% => OK
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0529801325 54% => OK
Sentence length: 43.1428571429 21.7502111507 198% => Sentence lengths are too long.
Sentence length SD: 153.413407072 49.3711431718 311% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 256.714285714 132.220823453 194% => Less chars per sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 43.1428571429 21.7502111507 198% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.0 0.878197800319 228% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 72.2819299905 50.5018328374 143% => OK
Elegance: 1.74117647059 1.90840788429 91% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.549887131256 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.182014974198 0.142949733639 127% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0643683319377 0.0787303798458 82% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.732993829723 0.631733273073 116% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.257626885256 0.139662658121 184% => Sentences are changing often in a paragraphs.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.266732575781 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.103435571967 0% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.412817763103 0.414875509568 100% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0495175708229 0.0530846634433 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.40443939384 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0528353158467 0% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.26048565121 70% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 3.49668874172 57% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 7.0 10.2958057395 68% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.