Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach.
The author of this statement recommends that all faculties must spend time working outside of academic environment. As far as I am concerned, this is a controversial issue and we can not give the same answer for all courses. I take this position account the following reasons.
First, usually teachers use boring methods of teaching, which have not more linked with the real world. This policy lets teachers to touch nature and adopt their knowledge with the real world. Moreover they could link theories with real examples and makes their teaching more attractive.
A further point we must consider is that the real world can inspire teachers to discover new thing, creating functional equipment, or even painting an awesome paint. As it is known, imagination plays a crucial role in most field of study, especially art courses. A painter can paint new landscapes out of the university, or writer can gain new idea for his writing.
In contrast, this policy may be usefulness in some courses such as mathematics. The university has many special facilities that a teacher can not have access them out of university. I think that there is not a better example of teacher of theoretical physics. This teacher has to use of mathematics equation and computer applications for confirming his theory. In addition, the specialized laboratory allows him to do accurately experiments and gain better result.
All above evidence supports this fact that working out of academic environment can assists teachers to enrich their knowledge, gain deeper understanding, and improve their method of teaching. Admittedly, as an English proverb “a coin has two sides”; therefore, those have the opposite view partially reasonable that in some field of study, teachers needs to work in the in the specialized laboratories, which only are in the university.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-31 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 70 | view |
| 2024-07-19 | Marqueetim | 83 | view |
| 2023-03-02 | tedyang777 | 50 | view |
| 2022-09-26 | Danbrilliant | 58 | view |
| 2022-09-25 | Danbrilliant | 62 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Attending a live performance (for example, a play, concert, or sporting event) is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 70
- Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws. 50
- Parents are the best teacher. Do you agree or disagree? 70
- Nowadays, food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved the way people live? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Attending a live performance (for example, a play, concert, or sporting event) is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 194, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...pt their knowledge with the real world. Moreover they could link theories with real exam...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y experiments and gain better result. All above evidence supports this fact th...
^^^
Line 9, column 84, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'assist'
Suggestion: assist
...working out of academic environment can assists teachers to enrich their knowledge, gai...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 374, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'in the'.
Suggestion: in the
... field of study, teachers needs to work in the in the specialized laboratories, which only ar...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'therefore', 'as to', 'i think', 'in addition', 'in contrast', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.246290801187 0.240241500013 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.142433234421 0.157235817809 91% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0979228486647 0.0880659088768 111% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0504451038576 0.0497285424764 101% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0445103857567 0.0444667217837 100% => OK
Prepositions: 0.121661721068 0.12292977631 99% => OK
Participles: 0.0237388724036 0.0406280797675 58% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.90501128767 2.79330140395 104% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0178041543027 0.030933414821 58% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.103857566766 0.0997080785238 104% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0296735905045 0.0249443105267 119% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00593471810089 0.0148568991511 40% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1860.0 2732.02544248 68% => OK
No of words: 298.0 452.878318584 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.24161073826 6.0361032391 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.58838876751 91% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.389261744966 0.366273622748 106% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.312080536913 0.280924506359 111% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.231543624161 0.200843997647 115% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.144295302013 0.132149295362 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90501128767 2.79330140395 104% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 219.290929204 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.597315436242 0.48968727796 122% => OK
Word variations: 65.7925928849 55.4138127331 119% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6194690265 78% => OK
Sentence length: 18.625 23.380412469 80% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.742908138 59.4972553346 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.25 141.124799967 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.625 23.380412469 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.625 0.674092028746 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.21349557522 77% => OK
Readability: 49.8330536913 51.4728631049 97% => OK
Elegance: 1.65 1.64882698954 100% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287107765891 0.391690518653 73% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0790389516038 0.123202303941 64% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0705038105541 0.077325440228 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.53277385874 0.547984918172 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.114535520537 0.149214159877 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102972439356 0.161403998019 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061689220286 0.0892212321368 69% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.193352599654 0.385218514788 50% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0923703561476 0.0692045440612 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174913276351 0.275328986314 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492174393428 0.0653680567796 75% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.4325221239 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 7.22455752212 111% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 13.5995575221 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.