The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
This line graphs illustrates the variations in number and type of 3 different fast food (pizzas, hamburgers, fish and chips) used by Australian youngers in between 1975 to 2000. Pizza and hamburger have gain its importance within these years as compared to fish and chips whose demand is declined with time.
In older times, fast foods like pizza and hamburgers were eaten in very low amount like in 1975, 3 to 5 pizzas and hamburgers were eaten by younger in one year. But as the time pass, the junk food gain its importance among people and within next 10 years 1975-1985 its number increased up to 40 per year, and in modern times (1985-2000) both pizza and hamburgers were eaten 100 times per year.
In comparison, within these 25 years of duration the consumption of fish and chips was continuously reduced from 100 times per year to 40 times per year, because junk food were used in large amount in modern times as compared to traditional food.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-30 | Mishika sugandhi | 73 | view |
- In the last 20 years there have been significant developments in the field of information technology (IT), for example the World Wide Web and communication by email. However, these developments in IT are likely to have more negative effects than positive 82
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 77
- With an increasing population communication via the internet and text messaging, face to face communication will become a thing of the past.To what extent do you agree? 56
- The performance of staff can have a significant impact on the success of a company What can companies do to increase staff productivity 54
- Some people think that a person can never understand the culture of a country unless they speak the language Do you agree with this opinion 61
Comments
Essay evaluation report
in between 1975 to 2000
from 1975 to 2000
Pizza and hamburger have gain its importance
Pizza and hamburger have gained their importance
But as the time pass
But as the time passes
the junk food gain its importance
the junk food gains its importance
Sentence: This line graphs illustrates the variations in number and type of 3 different fast food pizzas, hamburgers, fish and chips used by Australian youngers in between 1975 to 2000.
Error: youngers Suggestion: No alternate word
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Different Words: 86 100 //Don't repeat words, phrases and sentences.
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 5 10
No. of Words: 167 200
No. of Characters: 765 1000
No. of Different Words: 86 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.595 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.581 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.416 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 41 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 27 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 23 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 18 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 33.4 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.015 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.2 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.582 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.817 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.216 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 58, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...illustrates the variations in number and type of 3 different fast food pizzas, ha...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'if', 'so']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.294444444444 0.268076937826 110% => OK
Verbs: 0.111111111111 0.116061578633 96% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0722222222222 0.0759168565197 95% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0388888888889 0.0366838410393 106% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0166666666667 0.0131127313244 127% => OK
Prepositions: 0.172222222222 0.155750635184 111% => OK
Participles: 0.0555555555556 0.0379272487307 146% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.4489334232 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0333333333333 0.0210936926555 158% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0444444444444 0.0948980150116 47% => Some determiners wanted.
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00555555555556 0.00967000014798 57% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 953.0 1161.00487805 82% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.9 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70658682635 5.90752243213 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73763899035 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.251497005988 0.337110787985 75% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.167664670659 0.247514529752 68% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.137724550898 0.171178102325 80% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.107784431138 0.112407865282 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4489334232 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550898203593 0.546246751206 101% => OK
Word variations: 46.4463114129 49.3433353143 94% => OK
How many sentences: 5.0 8.93414634146 56% => OK
Sentence length: 33.4 23.0094962315 145% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2067868093 42.9750493124 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 190.6 135.714022679 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.4 23.0094962315 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.6 0.689975730869 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.84146341463 78% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.48048780488 68% => OK
Readability: 50.1664670659 47.7609492067 105% => OK
Elegance: 3.13333333333 2.94281807926 106% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345939824208 0.418131533498 83% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.225172539653 0.181151798455 124% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.136650448599 0.0850326197045 161% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.790770855534 0.706616315825 112% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.117663297495 0.157042692854 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.224386332364 0.228904883108 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0966643858059 0.108899403657 89% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.404931881205 0.367819155151 110% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0219046239137 0.0812612215331 27% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269031090911 0.316326947829 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0590473305972 0.0921553760075 64% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70731707317 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.14146341463 0% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.08536585366 24% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.16585365854 126% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 0.956097560976 0% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.02926829268 33% => OK
Total topic words: 5.0 7.1512195122 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.