TPO 43
Both the reading and speaking try to discuss about agnosites and their living habits. Although the reading states three theouries to defines the living ways of agnosites, the lecturer refute them all and bring three reasons to say that the reading's idea is erronous.
At first, In contrast to reading, which asserts that the agnosites probabely were free-swimming and hunted the small animals, the professor dismisses this idea due to the fact that the agnosites had the larg and well developed eyes. In addition, he speaks that the free-swimming animals in this era were blind and according to the fact that there were not any evidence about blindness of the agnosites in the found fossils, They were not able to be free-swimming.
Furthermore, the passage explains that they could be a sea floor inhabitants owing to the way which the early anthropods lived. However, the lecturer brings the reason that this idea is highly questionable due to this concept that the sea floor animals needed to move rapidly in order to travel the large distance to reach from one side of the sea to the other front. Besides, indeed, the agnosites moved slowly. Therefore, according to this fact, they could not live through the sea floor.
Finally, the author mentions that the agnosites might be parasites and hunted the larger animals because the many type of the modern arthropods lived in this way. Conversely, the speaker rejects this idea due to this fact that the population of modern day arthropods were so huge and they had the vast amount of individuals. Moreover, the number of the agnosites was not as the lager as the other species. So, the other modern day species of arthropods could rule out the agnosites. Owing to this fact, they were not able to be parasites.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-22 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2023-02-24 | m.ghoroobi | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-20 | m.ghoroobi | view | |
| 2022-09-03 | Allenwlh | 70 | view |
| 2022-04-16 | lhklin | 75 | view |
- Do you Agree or disagree: It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. 76
- When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, students will learn much more effectively than ask them to do alone 75
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Improving schools is the most important factor in the successful development of a country 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 241, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'readings'' or 'reading's'?
Suggestion: readings'; reading's
...and bring three reasons to say that the readings idea is erronous. At first, In contras...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 110, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun type seems to be countable; consider using: 'many types'.
Suggestion: many types
...d hunted the larger animals because the many type of the modern arthropods lived in this ...
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'conversely', 'finally', 'first', 'furthermore', 'however', 'moreover', 'so', 'therefore', 'well', 'in addition', 'in contrast', 'in contrast to']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.254545454545 0.261695866417 97% => OK
Verbs: 0.127272727273 0.158904122519 80% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0757575757576 0.0723426182421 105% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0545454545455 0.0435111971325 125% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0242424242424 0.0277247811725 87% => OK
Prepositions: 0.106060606061 0.128828473217 82% => OK
Participles: 0.0212121212121 0.0370669169778 57% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.55077112524 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0515151515152 0.0208969081088 247% => Less infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.160606060606 0.128158765124 125% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0121212121212 0.0158828679856 76% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00606060606061 0.0114777025283 53% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1766.0 1645.83664459 107% => OK
No of words: 300.0 271.125827815 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.88666666667 6.08160592843 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.04852973271 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.32 0.374372842146 85% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.243333333333 0.287516216867 85% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.176666666667 0.187439937562 94% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.12 0.113142543107 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55077112524 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.539623497131 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 49.7327817888 53.8517498576 92% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0529801325 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0769230769 21.7502111507 106% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.5521275818 49.3711431718 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.846153846 132.220823453 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0769230769 21.7502111507 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.878197800319 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 47.4102564103 50.5018328374 94% => OK
Elegance: 1.85294117647 1.90840788429 97% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.4714808563 0.549887131256 86% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.180356818173 0.142949733639 126% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.119100015228 0.0787303798458 151% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.684093235016 0.631733273073 108% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.192167794004 0.139662658121 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.252409625396 0.266732575781 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104931126342 0.103435571967 101% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.523911343332 0.414875509568 126% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.065278676532 0.0530846634433 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.363661735472 0.40443939384 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0768484388493 0.0528353158467 145% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.26048565121 188% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 1.0 3.49668874172 29% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.62251655629 28% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 5.0 3.1766004415 157% => OK
Total topic words: 7.0 10.2958057395 68% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.