three possible theories to explain why the Mary Rose sank suddenly
The author states three possible theories to explain why the Mary Rose sank suddenly in the passage, while the speaker refutes all of these arguments, claiming that the explanations are unclear.
Firstly, the writer points out that the flooded gunport of the Mary Rose might lead to the sink. The lecturer does not think this argument is watertight. According to him, the cannonballs are still in the gun-ports, which means that the Mary Rose did not even fire, and the gun-ports were closed before sinking. The cold, rigid fact apparently opposes the evidence based on the reading material.
Another important point made in the reading is that the ship's sailors were to blame. The professor refutes this flawy argument. According to him, the sailors of the Mary Rose would never fail to observe orders. Mary Rose was one of the largest and fastest ships in the British Navy; therefore, the ship's sailors were professional and capable. The sailors would not disobey the captain's orders; even they disliked the captain.
Finally, the reading asserts that the Mary Rose sank due to the huge damage done by the French ships, according to a French officer. The professor casts doubts on this argument According to the professor, the French officer is not objective. The officer might make this statement out of political incentive. It is understandable that if the Mary Rose had sunk owing to the damage in the battle, the French Navy could have been more powerful than the British Navy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-08 | m_aalaei | 68 | view |
| 2022-07-06 | Hello GRE | 83 | view |
| 2021-06-17 | talelaldabous | 70 | view |
| 2019-06-20 | Sravanthi27 | 71 | view |
| 2016-09-09 | kakapos | 80 | view |
- Should children spend most time playing and studying, or they should be required to help the family with household chores, like cooking and cleaning? 58
- Technology designed to make people’s lives simpler makes people’s lives more complicated, A/D 70
- Robert Redford Protect Our Wild Horses 70
- three possible theories that could explain the extinction of the Steller's sea cow 86
- threes theories to explain the argument that Antarctica was as much as 100°C warmer, supporting richer ecosystem than it is today 86
Discourse Markers used:
['apparently', 'finally', 'first', 'firstly', 'if', 'so', 'still', 'therefore', 'while']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.237410071942 0.261695866417 91% => OK
Verbs: 0.165467625899 0.158904122519 104% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0827338129496 0.0723426182421 114% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0503597122302 0.0435111971325 116% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0143884892086 0.0277247811725 52% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0863309352518 0.128828473217 67% => OK
Participles: 0.0467625899281 0.0370669169778 126% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.43165311838 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0359712230216 0.0208969081088 172% => OK
Particles: 0.00359712230216 0.00154638098197 233% => OK
Determiners: 0.176258992806 0.128158765124 138% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0179856115108 0.0158828679856 113% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00719424460432 0.0114777025283 63% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1490.0 1645.83664459 91% => OK
No of words: 249.0 271.125827815 92% => OK
Chars per words: 5.98393574297 6.08160592843 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.04852973271 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.341365461847 0.374372842146 91% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.281124497992 0.287516216867 98% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.172690763052 0.187439937562 92% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0963855421687 0.113142543107 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43165311838 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542168674699 0.539623497131 100% => OK
Word variations: 52.4381825518 53.8517498576 97% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0529801325 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.7857142857 21.7502111507 82% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9810452855 49.3711431718 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.428571429 132.220823453 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7857142857 21.7502111507 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.642857142857 0.878197800319 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 45.8981640849 50.5018328374 91% => OK
Elegance: 1.609375 1.90840788429 84% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.425392230613 0.549887131256 77% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.118199074506 0.142949733639 83% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0759810278544 0.0787303798458 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.668794242629 0.631733273073 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.166435077696 0.139662658121 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.188810922844 0.266732575781 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126997121823 0.103435571967 123% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.583620081045 0.414875509568 141% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0437179104956 0.0530846634433 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.334104419995 0.40443939384 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12760825465 0.0528353158467 242% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.26048565121 23% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 1.0 3.49668874172 29% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 9.0 3.62251655629 248% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.2958057395 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.