Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Fast and safe transportation system and improved communication are two important aspects of the development of a country. Every government wants its citizens to commute safely and faster while the trade and business also depend on a solid transportation system. Thus when the question arises whether a government should focus on improving its railways or roads, people seems like have divided opinions. I personally agree that a government should spend more money on railways system as it is better to develop the railway transpiration system than developing roads.
Fast of all railways offers safe commuting both for the citizens and traders. The numbers of road accidents and casualties road vehicles cause in many countries are far more than that of accidents in the railway system. Thus investing more on a safe way of commuting is a much more prudent idea. Rails cause comparatively less environmental damage while the road vehicles are the main reason for increasing pollution around the world.
Second, rails can carry hundreds of people and several tonnes of goods while road transports can carry only a few people or fewer amounts of products at a time. Some shuttle trains are many times faster than that of private cars and public buses. Thus improved railways would save peoples’ valuable time every day. Thirdly, rail lines are usually away from the main cities and that is why some busy cities have no other alternatives than to improve their rail transportation system. Express trains can reduce the congestions in many cities and more investment to improve the railways is the only possible solutions in cities where a large number of people live in.
Finally, the population of the world is increasing rapidly and that is why investing more money on faster and safer transportation system is more logical than investing in the older transportation system. Railways will be future in transportation and investing on it is the better choice for any government.
In conclusion, I believe that a government, either in a developed or a developing country, should invest to build a safer, faster and more reliable transportation system and railways thus should always get a priority over the roads.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-09 | BlackDelta | 80 | view |
| 2018-08-03 | dade174 | 67 | view |
- A Canadian friend recently sent you a present by post You want to thank him her Write a letter to your friend In your letter Say how you felt when you received the present Describe what you like about it Explain how you will use the present 63
- On recent holiday you lost a valuable item. Fortunately you have travel insurance to cover the cost of anything lost.Write a letter the manager of your insurance company. In your letter-Describe the item you lost-Explain how you lost it-Tell insurance com 78
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roadsTo what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement? 64
- You want to apply for the following job. Write a letter to Mrs. Kellerdescribing your previous experience and explaining why you would besuitable for the job. 78
- You have just returned home after living with a family in an English-speaking country for six months. You now realize that you left a small bag of personal possessions in your room. Write to the family describing the things you left behind. Ask them to se 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 263, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...epend on a solid transportation system. Thus when the question arises whether a gove...
^^^^
Line 1, column 468, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'railways'' or 'railway's'?
Suggestion: railways'; railway's
...a government should spend more money on railways system as it is better to develop the r...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 637, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...only possible solutions in cities where a large number of people live in. Finally, the populat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'finally', 'second', 'so', 'third', 'thirdly', 'thus', 'while', 'in conclusion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.289405684755 0.247107183377 117% => OK
Verbs: 0.129198966408 0.155533422707 83% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0956072351421 0.0946595960268 101% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0671834625323 0.0501214627716 134% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0180878552972 0.0437548338989 41% => OK
Prepositions: 0.121447028424 0.122226691241 99% => OK
Participles: 0.031007751938 0.0403226058552 77% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.88987162772 2.80594681477 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0129198966408 0.0326793684256 40% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.116279069767 0.0861772015684 135% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0232558139535 0.021408717616 109% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0103359173127 0.011925033212 87% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2223.0 1933.35771543 115% => OK
No of words: 360.0 316.048096192 114% => OK
Chars per words: 6.175 6.12580529183 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20517956788 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.397222222222 0.374742101984 106% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.266666666667 0.28420135186 94% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.197222222222 0.203846283523 97% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.125 0.137316102897 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88987162772 2.80594681477 103% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.037074148 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.56093040696 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 52.8723873659 60.7387585426 87% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0891783567 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.5 20.7743622355 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6802747365 49.517814964 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.9375 127.492653851 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7743622355 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5625 0.814263465372 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.99599198397 75% => OK
Readability: 49.1666666667 49.1944974215 100% => OK
Elegance: 2.06024096386 1.69124875643 122% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120409577575 0.332605444948 36% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.111745215169 0.102741220458 109% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0854489107881 0.0668466124924 128% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.556117726879 0.534860350844 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.189751482967 0.148594505496 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0570702931073 0.134430193775 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617439886722 0.0742795772207 83% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.305899347898 0.324371583561 94% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0188217861391 0.0638462369009 29% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0912151596197 0.228012699653 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553022992981 0.058150111329 95% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.68436873747 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.41683366733 59% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 5.90881763527 152% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.5751503006 39% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 1.9629258517 102% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 10.4468937876 115% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.