Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The number of female students increased as the women's power increases, and which have resulted in more acceptances of the gender equality perceptions. There is a rising for such an opinion, because the gender equalities in universities can provide an opportunity for both genders to experience in all activities. Even though the gender equality prevents the gender perceptions and giving the every opportunities for both genders, it is impossible to achieve for two reasons which are the realistic inept and the future careers.
As the society develops, female's power has been increased as the time passes by. Since the society improved from the industrial era to information age, the labour work required by men is getting reduced and the female proportion rose. As the more women workers increased, the women power increased and which have result in the gender equilibrium. Therefore, the gender equality perception is the possible result from such development.
As the gender equality is a growing issue, there is a growing voice of improving the gender equality at universities. The gender equality at universities can provide a various opportunities for both genders to experience in every activity to break the gender stereotype of perceptions. Also, the provision of the same educational levels in all genders without having any biased, will create the equality of genders in education.
In contrast to the equality of genders in education and the creation of gender equality perception, it is realistically impossible to achieve for realistic reasons. Realistically, there is a certain preference in each subject. For instance, it is very general to see that, there are more male proportions in mathematics related subjects (computer programming, science and finances) than females. It is physically proved that males have more potential in cognitive and logical thinking, whereas females are feeling more comfortable in interactions and relationship based. Therefore, the gender equality is the ideal perceptions that inept to achieve realistically.
Another possible reason could be the future careers. The major concern for majority of students is about their future careers and the gender equality perception is not the concern. If certain subjects are related to their future careers, students will be studying for it at every cost. In that case, having the inequality number of genders in subject is inevitable. By having the gender equalities in every subject at universities can be seen as the forceful action which ignores the student's future career.
In conclusion, the gender equality is an ideal perception to be achieved, but it should not be made at universities for the realistic and career reasons. Realistically, the choice on each subject is based on students' future careers and their interests, and the inequality in the number of genders is inevitable results.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-07 | cindycornelia98 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | cindycornelia98 | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | cindycornelia98 | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-28 | Narges.s | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-25 | Moaz | 67 | view |
- The line chart shows the average annual growth rates during selected periods, selected based on data availability, for population growth, energy growth, and real GDP growth between 1820 and 2010. 73
- The following chart illustrates the results of a British survey taken in 2005 related to Housing preferences of UK people. 67
- The bar chart shows the import and export of Canada (values in $) from 1991 to 1995. 73
- It is believe that the traffic police should apply heavy fines to driver violating the traffic regulation in order to decrease the numbers of road accident. Do you agree or disagree with his idea? 56
- The chart below shows the sales revenue in dollars at three branches of a bank in the first quarter of 2010. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 177, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'opportunity'?
Suggestion: opportunity
...y at universities can provide a various opportunities for both genders to experience in every...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'so', 'therefore', 'whereas', 'for instance', 'in conclusion', 'in contrast', 'in contrast to']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.291750503018 0.247107183377 118% => OK
Verbs: 0.146881287726 0.155533422707 94% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0764587525151 0.0946595960268 81% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0241448692153 0.0501214627716 48% => Some adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0181086519115 0.0437548338989 41% => OK
Prepositions: 0.132796780684 0.122226691241 109% => OK
Participles: 0.0503018108652 0.0403226058552 125% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.01766991915 2.80594681477 108% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0221327967807 0.0326793684256 68% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.134808853119 0.0861772015684 156% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0140845070423 0.021408717616 66% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.010060362173 0.011925033212 84% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2890.0 1933.35771543 149% => OK
No of words: 452.0 316.048096192 143% => OK
Chars per words: 6.39380530973 6.12580529183 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.20517956788 110% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.451327433628 0.374742101984 120% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.347345132743 0.28420135186 122% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.25 0.203846283523 123% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.152654867257 0.137316102897 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01766991915 2.80594681477 108% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.037074148 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.426991150442 0.56093040696 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 46.9122759595 60.7387585426 77% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0891783567 137% => OK
Sentence length: 20.5454545455 20.7743622355 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1073981397 49.517814964 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.363636364 127.492653851 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5454545455 20.7743622355 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.454545454545 0.814263465372 56% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38877755511 137% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.99599198397 25% => OK
Readability: 55.2799678198 49.1944974215 112% => OK
Elegance: 2.51063829787 1.69124875643 148% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155231694527 0.332605444948 47% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.152919272462 0.102741220458 149% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0782016992422 0.0668466124924 117% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.610713937544 0.534860350844 114% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.117120915264 0.148594505496 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078402136655 0.134430193775 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448222299272 0.0742795772207 60% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.455364407236 0.324371583561 140% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0935963393959 0.0638462369009 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120336560884 0.228012699653 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383167389124 0.058150111329 66% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 8.68436873747 196% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.41683366733 117% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 5.90881763527 169% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.5751503006 39% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 1.9629258517 153% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 10.4468937876 134% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.