TPO 41
No one can cast a shadow of doubt on the fact that in today's progressive world we live in, teachers paly a crucial role for upbringing more erudite people in the society. Teachers are the architect of our future generation. They encourage students to be their best. So, they should be respected as much as possible. Some believe that teachers were more valued by the society in the past, while others oppose this idea and assert that nowadays, they are more appreciated. I personally concur with the later groups' idea. In what follows, my own opinions would be delineated.
The first reason coming to mind is that in these days, students have more and better communication with their teachers. If teachers have a good relationship with their students, they will make more positive influences on them. At the present time, some teachers go on field trips with their pupils. They not only have lots of fun with each other but also instruct better. As it turns out; they would probably praise their teachers due to a pleasant behavior of them. However, in the olden times, instructors always had some limitations in their classrooms. They made some barriers between themselves and students by doing strict manners. It is clearly evident that, as a teacher be intransigent, students will not have any tendency to learn. Thus, they cannot admire them.
the second reason is rooted in the extension of assistance of teachers beyond the school work. Thanks to the rapid growth of technology, students in this modern era, can have more contacts with their teachers. Most of the pupils can access the internet very easily by their tablet and laptop. In addition, there are some appropriate applications like Skype, Telegram, and Facetime that facilitate connections between educators and students. As a matter of fact, through this applications, schoolchild have more opportunities to solve their academic problems with the help of their educators even after school time. In this way, students can more realize the value of the teachers. For instance, my sister is a math teacher. She allocates most of her time to answer her students' math questions even out of her school work. In some cases, she instructs them by using the Skype. Her students have always a very respectful behavior with her.
In conclusion, based on aforementioned reasons, teachers are more praised or valued by the society now than the past. advances in technology and having a good relationship between schoolchild and teachers are responsible for appreciation of educators.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-21 | dr.samiaelwakil | 71 | view |
| 2021-08-17 | nida fatima | 66 | view |
| 2021-08-15 | TOEFLpreparation | 66 | view |
| 2021-07-10 | vida00 | 76 | view |
| 2021-04-06 | ursula | 60 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in todays progressive world we live in, teachers paly a crucial role for upbring...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...n. Thus, they cannot admire them. the second reason is rooted in the extensio...
^^^
Line 6, column 471, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... students. As a matter of fact, through this applications, schoolchild have more opp...
^^^^
Line 8, column 119, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Advances
...alued by the society now than the past. advances in technology and having a good relatio...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'thus', 'while', 'for instance', 'in addition', 'in conclusion', 'as a matter of fact', 'in some cases']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.240506329114 0.229887763892 105% => OK
Verbs: 0.122362869198 0.158761421928 77% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0864978902954 0.0866891130778 100% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0548523206751 0.046263068375 119% => OK
Pronouns: 0.07805907173 0.0685040099705 114% => OK
Prepositions: 0.143459915612 0.118717715034 121% => OK
Participles: 0.0232067510549 0.0351676179071 66% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.73178273628 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0147679324895 0.0309702414327 48% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.00210970464135 0.00188951952338 112% => OK
Determiners: 0.0949367088608 0.0887237588012 107% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0210970464135 0.0209618222197 101% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0042194092827 0.0139019557991 30% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2551.0 2387.08602151 107% => OK
No of words: 419.0 408.028673835 103% => OK
Chars per words: 6.08830548926 5.86048508987 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.48200974243 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.360381861575 0.338922669872 106% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.255369928401 0.251872472559 101% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.212410501193 0.174417080927 122% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.121718377088 0.112833075102 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73178273628 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551312649165 0.524397521467 105% => OK
Word variations: 64.1953797546 59.2087087015 108% => OK
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6684587814 135% => OK
Sentence length: 14.9642857143 20.5533526081 73% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5114940652 48.84282405 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1071428571 120.699889404 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9642857143 20.5533526081 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 0.644075263715 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.54480286738 72% => OK
Readability: 40.5012785544 45.7405998639 89% => OK
Elegance: 1.59504132231 1.45489161554 110% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.300154397459 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0670217916143 0.103427244359 65% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0598408081518 0.0752933317313 79% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.402869763208 0.497263757937 81% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.148966741306 0.151897553556 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.114077575197 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0781384742642 0% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.356363616598 0.336927656856 106% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0388131506883 0.067059652881 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.210909579961 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0618886996521 0% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8870967742 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.86379928315 52% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.91756272401 203% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 14.0 8.42114695341 166% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.4623655914 41% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 2.75985663082 217% => OK
Total topic words: 21.0 13.6433691756 154% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.