Universities should spend more money on facilities(such as computer lab and technology in general) rather than on hiring some famous professors
Nowadays, attending to university become more and more prevalent due to various reasons, but the important issue is, for many people, it is accounted as an efficient tool to prepare children to enter into the real society. Because of the vital role of university the attitude toward it is varied so that a plethora of people is in the conviction that universities should allocate more money to keep up-to-date the facilities. Contrary to this popular belief, there are those who argue that recruiting the famous professors should be set as a priority owing to their influential impact on the students. I am of the opinion that, facilities plays significant role for the students, and the following explanations will further elaborate on this perspective.
First and foremost, we live in the era of time that there are numerous advanced technologies and sciences. The Internet is undoubtedly the useful and efficient tool that creates huge alteration in human life, and it is continually keep going. In fact, the advent of the internet made a big difference in different facets of communities especially education system. Children enable to access to wide range of information thanks to technological advances of search engines with undermines the position of teachers. Therefore, the presence of professor is not an absolute necessity for each class. Besides, the well-known does not guarantee the knowledge of a person since students can get acquainted with all of those sources just by a click. Subsequently, teachers should present other factors in order to pursue students attend in their class and get involved in discussions.
Another crucial fact that should be taken into consideration is that one of the primary purposes that children decided to go to the university is preparing for their future career. Admittedly, a large crowed of graduated youths has made a fierce competition among them to get a job; so more they become knowledgeable and experienced in their field, more they have a chance to find a job. in this situation, it seems that companies are looking for the employees who have some extra features more that abundant information, and providing the better facilities for the students opens up this opportunity for them to become successful in getting their desired occupation. Besides, labs or computers allow the fellow students to learn the material deeply with practical experience which is very precious chance for each individual.
on the basis of the points mentioned above, I am convinced that universities should divide their budget in a way that they give more money to provide better and efficient facilities for the students. Because they not only helps them to find a better job in the future, but also let them to experience practical learning.
- TPO 32 85
- Has technology made the world a better place to live 88
- Governments should pay more on computer technology or basic needs? 76
- A/D: Students should not take part-time jobs while they are studying in university. 73
- Agree/Disagree Q. If you do not make sure other people (especially influential people or your employers) know about your strengths and accomplishments, you will never get successful in life. 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 232, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'kept'.
Suggestion: kept
...on in human life, and it is continually keep going. In fact, the advent of the inter...
^^^^
Line 5, column 389, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
... more they have a chance to find a job. in this situation, it seems that companies...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...precious chance for each individual. on the basis of the points mentioned above...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'besides', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'look', 'so', 'therefore', 'well', 'in fact']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.230612244898 0.229887763892 100% => OK
Verbs: 0.148979591837 0.158761421928 94% => OK
Adjectives: 0.10612244898 0.0866891130778 122% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0428571428571 0.046263068375 93% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0428571428571 0.0685040099705 63% => OK
Prepositions: 0.136734693878 0.118717715034 115% => OK
Participles: 0.0367346938776 0.0351676179071 104% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.91588136316 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0408163265306 0.0309702414327 132% => OK
Particles: 0.00204081632653 0.00188951952338 108% => OK
Determiners: 0.114285714286 0.0887237588012 129% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0142857142857 0.0209618222197 68% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0102040816327 0.0139019557991 73% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2791.0 2387.08602151 117% => OK
No of words: 452.0 408.028673835 111% => OK
Chars per words: 6.17477876106 5.86048508987 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.48200974243 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.389380530973 0.338922669872 115% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.296460176991 0.251872472559 118% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.241150442478 0.174417080927 138% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.172566371681 0.112833075102 153% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91588136316 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553097345133 0.524397521467 105% => OK
Word variations: 66.123163323 59.2087087015 112% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6684587814 82% => OK
Sentence length: 26.5882352941 20.5533526081 129% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0566175954 48.84282405 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.176470588 120.699889404 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5882352941 20.5533526081 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.588235294118 0.644075263715 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.54480286738 54% => OK
Readability: 56.2342529932 45.7405998639 123% => OK
Elegance: 1.72173913043 1.45489161554 118% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128442824412 0.300154397459 43% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.109992602739 0.103427244359 106% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0477628944607 0.0752933317313 63% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.548526214029 0.497263757937 110% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.112601286113 0.151897553556 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060514403635 0.114077575197 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494713393368 0.0781384742642 63% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.469519278282 0.336927656856 139% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0298762254638 0.067059652881 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104317723111 0.210909579961 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299583770157 0.0618886996521 48% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8870967742 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.86379928315 26% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.91756272401 81% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 8.42114695341 95% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.4623655914 41% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.75985663082 109% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 13.6433691756 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.