The fist step to self-knowledge is rejection of the familiar.
The recommendation is quite true that the first step to self-knowledge is rejection of the familiar. Indeed, it is true that we learn more from conflicting ideas and debate than from the ones who have similar knowledge and ideas of innovation. Also, people always learn from different people who have different ideas and skills.
Firstly, if all the people have same knowledge and ideas of thinking for a particular topic then the innovation or knowledge imparted with be quite less. But, if there are critics and the people who would cross question and are polemical to your ideas. It would mean that you would have to think from all the prospects of it and then the idea and innovation can be put forward. Additionally, this would increase your level of thinking and many more contrasting ideas which would be required for development can be established. For example, if there is any innovation being made then before bringing it to the market the prototype is tested by various people of different background so that if there are any problem associated with it that can be sorted out. Other example being in companies such as Intel where the Arithmetic Logic Unit and different silicon chips are simulated, it is always in the group of different people that the simulation is being done so that the unit which has less delay and high throughput is selected. Moreover, the main idea behind having separate groups is that as everyone is unique each and everyone has different way of thinking and coming up with new ideas. So, the groups have various algorithm and based on them the unit is developed and since there are different groups the one which has less delay and high throughput is selected only after they have explained it and the conflicting ideas are being resolved. However, if people would have similar knowledge and are quirk then the innovations would have been done with lots of inefficiencies and problems would have not been totally resolved.
Additionally, many Universities select students in their research and development department from various backgrounds and different areas so that the research would have varying ideas and the best one can be picked up. So, I would like to conclude that it is true that for ones betterment and knowledge one should always reject the people having familiar ideas.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-09-19 | laukikkarnavat | 50 | view |
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station."Over the past year, our late-night programs has devoted time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this time period, most of the complaints receive 50
- The following opinion was provided in a letter to the editor of a national aeronautics magazine:“Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great 43
- High schools should require all of their students to play a musical instrument. 50
- The following appeared n a letter to the editor of a local newspaper in Masontown."If we want to save money on municipal garbage disposal fees,we need to encourage residents to recycle more. Late last year, our neighbouring town, Hayesworth, passed a law 70
- The following appeared as a part of a letter to the editor of a scientific journal."A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual's levels of stimulation. The study showed that in stimulating si 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 125, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of the familiar. Indeed, it is true that we learn more from conflicting ideas and...
^^
Line 3, column 708, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'problems'?
Suggestion: problems
...ent background so that if there are any problem associated with it that can be sorted o...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 274, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ke to conclude that it is true that for ones betterment and knowledge one should alw...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'then', 'for example', 'such as', 'it is true']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.203349282297 0.240241500013 85% => OK
Verbs: 0.200956937799 0.157235817809 128% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0909090909091 0.0880659088768 103% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0598086124402 0.0497285424764 120% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0382775119617 0.0444667217837 86% => OK
Prepositions: 0.11961722488 0.12292977631 97% => OK
Participles: 0.0813397129187 0.0406280797675 200% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.64712714504 2.79330140395 95% => OK
Infinitives: 0.011961722488 0.030933414821 39% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.00717703349282 0.0016655270985 431% => OK
Determiners: 0.0693779904306 0.0997080785238 70% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0358851674641 0.0249443105267 144% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0191387559809 0.0148568991511 129% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2331.0 2732.02544248 85% => OK
No of words: 392.0 452.878318584 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.94642857143 6.0361032391 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.58838876751 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.30612244898 0.366273622748 84% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.227040816327 0.280924506359 81% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.19387755102 0.200843997647 97% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.137755102041 0.132149295362 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64712714504 2.79330140395 95% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 219.290929204 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.44387755102 0.48968727796 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 46.8223125398 55.4138127331 84% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6194690265 68% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 23.380412469 120% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.8487520729 59.4972553346 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 166.5 141.124799967 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 23.380412469 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.857142857143 0.674092028746 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.94800884956 61% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 50.7040816327 51.4728631049 99% => OK
Elegance: 1.352 1.64882698954 82% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350921174278 0.391690518653 90% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.178967661149 0.123202303941 145% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0585484774042 0.077325440228 76% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.570575943369 0.547984918172 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.123449689207 0.149214159877 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.184100992071 0.161403998019 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.167130297066 0.0892212321368 187% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.512068896695 0.385218514788 133% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0022056532614 0.0692045440612 3% => Paragraphs are so close to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.287550478194 0.275328986314 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0890981057904 0.0653680567796 136% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.4325221239 58% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.30420353982 113% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 7.22455752212 83% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.66592920354 136% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 13.5995575221 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.