Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organisations. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Some could think it would be benefits to do so for comfortable and the development relationship with co-workers. However, working in different organisation can enhance adaptability and flexibility skills. Therefore, I believe that the improvement of social skills especially future career aspects and flexibility would be more beneficial than that of feeling comfortable and building a business relationship.
On the one hand, working in the same organisation provides the feeling of comfortable, convenience and security. Always having the repetitive working cycles; same environments, same co-workers and same tasks or projects, provide the feeling of security and comfortable. Since the nature of people is a risk adverse, avoid the changes and challenges, many prefer to work in a same organisation. Also, there are opportunities to build a business relationship with co-workers. When people are working at the same company for a long time, they build a trust, honest and relationship with their co-workers and which easily become a business partner. Therefore, working within the companies for a long time bring a benefit of feeling of comfortable, convenience and security as well as building a business relationship with colleagues.
On the other hand, working in different organisations has several advantages. To start with, people have better opportunities for future careers. Usually working for the different company means working for the higher positions or there are more future opportunities to grow. If they are working in different organisations in different countries, they might have to learn other skills related to the cultures (languages, customs and tradition, for example). Furthermore, people can get flexibility by working for different companies. For instance, Google has the flexible working schedules, whereas Ernst & Young is known for having strict working schedules. Therefore, by working in different companies enhance people's adaptation and flexibility.
In my opinion, I understand the comfortable feelings for working in a company bring a person with a security and there will be having more chances to build a relationship with a co-worker which develop to a business partner. In the case of my friend, David has worked for the Deloitte for more than 20 years but he has not developed any business relationship with any of his colleagues or tries to convince customers to be his own. Likewise, not everyone would be getting the opportunities to change the long time relationship into a business relationship. Even though the feeling of comfortable and convenience seems easy lifestyles, the adaptation and flexibility will enhance people broaden their views. Therefore, the opportunities to learn about the adaptation and flexibility have more benefits than that of feeling comfortable.
In conclusion, there are both aspects for working in a company for a long time; the feeling of comfortable and convenience by working in the same company while future career opportunities and flexibility for working in different companies. These can be learnt by changing the organisations. By doing that, people are able to broaden their horizons.
- The chart shows a percentage of live births by age of mother for UK and non-UK born mothers, 2015 73
- In many countries people are concerned about the number of children who are overweight What do you think are the causes of this What solutions can you suggest 71
- Biotechnology companies all over the world are developing different types of genetically modified (GM) crops. However, not enough is known about the effects of these crops on our health and on environment. Inferring with nature in this way should be prohi 73
- The better way to relax and reduce stress is by spending some time alone. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- The chart below shows the different levels of post-school qualifications in the UK and the proportion of men and women who held them in 2008 78
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'likewise', 'so', 'therefore', 'well', 'whereas', 'while', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in conclusion', 'as well as', 'in my opinion', 'to start with', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.26247689464 0.247107183377 106% => OK
Verbs: 0.15157116451 0.155533422707 97% => OK
Adjectives: 0.090573012939 0.0946595960268 96% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0314232902033 0.0501214627716 63% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0258780036969 0.0437548338989 59% => OK
Prepositions: 0.13123844732 0.122226691241 107% => OK
Participles: 0.0591497227357 0.0403226058552 147% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.22838916035 2.80594681477 115% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0258780036969 0.0326793684256 79% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0998151571165 0.0861772015684 116% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0184842883549 0.021408717616 86% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00554528650647 0.011925033212 47% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3171.0 1933.35771543 164% => OK
No of words: 486.0 316.048096192 154% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.52469135802 6.12580529183 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69525374022 4.20517956788 112% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.432098765432 0.374742101984 115% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.358024691358 0.28420135186 126% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.251028806584 0.203846283523 123% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.191358024691 0.137316102897 139% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22838916035 2.80594681477 115% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.037074148 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.415637860082 0.56093040696 74% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 46.6144048659 60.7387585426 77% => OK
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0891783567 149% => OK
Sentence length: 20.25 20.7743622355 97% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.210274697 49.517814964 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.125 127.492653851 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 20.7743622355 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.75 0.814263465372 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.99599198397 0% => OK
Readability: 56.0524691358 49.1944974215 114% => OK
Elegance: 2.16814159292 1.69124875643 128% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354977693535 0.332605444948 107% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.138647151391 0.102741220458 135% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0958044091252 0.0668466124924 143% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.528510366861 0.534860350844 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.137980604867 0.148594505496 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135235143678 0.134430193775 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047751985546 0.0742795772207 64% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.356060411542 0.324371583561 110% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0324009139838 0.0638462369009 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235039330049 0.228012699653 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400660989218 0.058150111329 69% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 8.68436873747 230% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.41683366733 88% => OK
Positive topic words: 19.0 5.90881763527 322% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.5751503006 39% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 1.9629258517 153% => OK
Total topic words: 23.0 10.4468937876 220% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.