Nowadays, people live in societies that consumer goods have become cheaper. Do you think the advantages of consumer goods being cheaper outweigh the disadvantages?
In this recent century, the consumer goods are available with a wide range of option where it allows people to purchase goods at cheaper prices. This brings the benefits for people to possess more goods without worrying to make a choice between goods. However, I believe that the disadvantages of cheaper consumer goods outweigh the advantages, because it lead the society to become materialistic and there are possibilities for people to obtain impulsive purchasing habits which can affect the environment.
The cheaper consumer goods would provide a various options for the public. In other words, people do not have to make a choice between those options, because the price is cheap, they afford most of goods. The more possession of goods is available; it leads to feeling of satisfaction and feeling of security as well as comfortable lifestyles. The comfortable lifestyles can result in improvement of standard of living. Hence, the consumer goods being cheap are beneficial for the improvement of living standard and the variety of options to choose from.
On the other hand, the more goods at a cheaper price have influence society to be materialistic. If people possess more goods, it can easily form a competition about people's possessions. For example, when people owned a car, other people may try to possess two cars to compete. In the worst case, people judge other person by their materialistic possessions instead of other values. Thus, it transforms the society into materialistic society.
In addition, the impulsive purchasing habits are inevitable. People do not have to buy necessity items, only because all consumer goods are cheap. These impulsive shopping habits can affect a factory to producing of goods excessively and which results in more wastes to the environment. Because more goods are available, people will get easily substitute goods with new one, and these produce massive amounts of trashes to the environment. Therefore, the impulsive purchasing habits have a harmful effect to the environment.
In conclusion, the cheaper consumer goods provide a wide range of selections that improves the standard of living, but it causes damages to societal and environmental aspects. It cannot deny that the society change into materialistic and the environments can be damaged by impulsive purchasing habits. Therefore, the cheaper consumer goods have more of disadvantages than that of advantages.
- Some people think that the role of parents is to discipline their children and teach them about right and wrong Other people consider that the main responsibility of parents is to nurture their children and provide them with a safe environment to grow up 93
- The pie charts below show the percentage of housing owned and rented in the UK in 1991 and 2007. 67
- The diagram below shows how central heating system in a house works 89
- The table below shows the results of a survey on workplace complaints in Germany in 2001. 67
- The graph below gives information from a 22008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 357, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'leads'?
Suggestion: leads
...ods outweigh the advantages, because it lead the society to become materialistic and...
^^^^
Line 2, column 52, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'option'?
Suggestion: option
... consumer goods would provide a various options for the public. In other words, people ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 190, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the goods') or simply say ''most goods''.
Suggestion: most of the goods; most goods
...because the price is cheap, they afford most of goods. The more possession of goods is availa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'well', 'for example', 'in addition', 'in conclusion', 'as well as', 'in other words', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.269320843091 0.247107183377 109% => OK
Verbs: 0.131147540984 0.155533422707 84% => OK
Adjectives: 0.117096018735 0.0946595960268 124% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0327868852459 0.0501214627716 65% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0234192037471 0.0437548338989 54% => OK
Prepositions: 0.121779859485 0.122226691241 100% => OK
Participles: 0.0117096018735 0.0403226058552 29% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.93882526836 2.80594681477 105% => OK
Infinitives: 0.03981264637 0.0326793684256 122% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.105386416862 0.0861772015684 122% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0210772833724 0.021408717616 98% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0117096018735 0.011925033212 98% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2425.0 1933.35771543 125% => OK
No of words: 383.0 316.048096192 121% => OK
Chars per words: 6.3315926893 6.12580529183 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.20517956788 105% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.436031331593 0.374742101984 116% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.321148825065 0.28420135186 113% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.201044386423 0.203846283523 99% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.135770234987 0.137316102897 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93882526836 2.80594681477 105% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.037074148 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469973890339 0.56093040696 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 49.769706223 60.7387585426 82% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0891783567 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.2380952381 20.7743622355 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1645552056 49.517814964 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.476190476 127.492653851 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2380952381 20.7743622355 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.714285714286 0.814263465372 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.99599198397 75% => OK
Readability: 50.3529777446 49.1944974215 102% => OK
Elegance: 2.15 1.69124875643 127% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.46520962222 0.332605444948 140% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.128225549333 0.102741220458 125% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0797929633429 0.0668466124924 119% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.567445702247 0.534860350844 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.115748410419 0.148594505496 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.196845054148 0.134430193775 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114649034727 0.0742795772207 154% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.360057921853 0.324371583561 111% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0849821732899 0.0638462369009 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.332669544924 0.228012699653 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0891579142898 0.058150111329 153% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.68436873747 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.41683366733 263% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 6.0 5.90881763527 102% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 2.5751503006 194% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 1.9629258517 306% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 10.4468937876 163% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.