Seniority (years of service) should not be the basis of employee compensation. Employees should be promoted and given raises solely on the basis of their work performance and merit. That is a better way to encourage high productivity
Issue presented above states that the promotion of employee should only be based on their performance and merit, and not considering the years of service that he has done. This means that regardless of how young or old you are, you stand an equal chance to grab the promotion given that you present with the required performace and also carry with you the necessary merit. Which is in turn fair.
Work performance does not only display the actual skills that an employee possess, but also gives the proof that the employee is able to put his skills into work. A sales employee can best be evaluated on the basis of number of products that he sold. Not merely on just how many years has that employee been working. Also merit is the written and verified proof that speaks for the employee's skills.
As an employee starts getting used to the work that he has been doing, as he gains years of service, then that work doesn't appeal to the employee as much as it used to do in the begining. The employee starts looking at his job as a monotonous work which put offs the fire that was burning in him initially. The perfect example for this reason is the employee working in the government office since many years. To get some work done from that employee takes a toll of the customer. Also, some of the work profressions, such as manual labour have proclivity towards a young employee rather than an aged employee. Because a young employee will have the required energy of the manual work. On the other hand, years of experience of a senior worker will not be of any advantage to the job. As the requirement of the job is different
Although, on the other hand, seniority plays a crucial role in gathering wisdom depending upon the sector that emplyee is working . Employee those have been working since many years know all the corners of that work. Their several years of experience can come in hand during the times of difficult situation which a rookie might not be able to handle.
As we can see from the above arguments, the pros outwiegh the cons of the issue. But rather that totally rejecting the seniority as a factor and solely focusing on the work performance and merit, one should keep look at a weighted view of all the factors depending on the type of work. This will be the best of both worlds.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-24 | Sruthi Bheemineni | 50 | view |
| 2019-08-24 | Shrija Sheth | 83 | view |
| 2019-06-19 | fresky | 40 | view |
| 2019-03-18 | Rakshick Shrinivas | 50 | view |
| 2019-01-07 | abyz123 | 58 | view |
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 16
- An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor's record of treating similarly afflicted patients. Through gaining such access, the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat the medical condition 54
- The following advice was given to a politician by his political consultant:It is true that 200 apartment renters protested in the rain about the elimination of rent control regulation. However, there are 20,000 renters in the entire city. 19,800 of them s 57
- Seniority (years of service) should not be the basis of employee compensation. Employees should be promoted and given raises solely on the basis of their work performance and merit. That is a better way to encourage high productivity 50
- Some people believe that increasing violence in the media is the cause of increasing violence in our society, especially among children. Others believe that children's peer groups and parental role models are a much more influence on children's behavior. 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 374, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...lso carry with you the necessary merit. Which is in turn fair. Work performance do...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 318, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...y years has that employee been working. Also merit is the written and verified proof...
^^^^
Line 5, column 117, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... gains years of service, then that work doesnt appeal to the employee as much as it us...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 488, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...yee takes a toll of the customer. Also, some of the work profressions, such as manual labou...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 612, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... employee rather than an aged employee. Because a young employee will have the required...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 786, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ill not be of any advantage to the job. As the requirement of the job is different...
^^
Line 7, column 130, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... upon the sector that emplyee is working . Employee those have been working since ...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'look', 'so', 'then', 'such as', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.238839285714 0.240241500013 99% => OK
Verbs: 0.162946428571 0.157235817809 104% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0647321428571 0.0880659088768 74% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0491071428571 0.0497285424764 99% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0334821428571 0.0444667217837 75% => OK
Prepositions: 0.154017857143 0.12292977631 125% => OK
Participles: 0.0602678571429 0.0406280797675 148% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.34247029882 2.79330140395 84% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0178571428571 0.030933414821 58% => OK
Particles: 0.00223214285714 0.0016655270985 134% => OK
Determiners: 0.145089285714 0.0997080785238 146% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0200892857143 0.0249443105267 81% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0133928571429 0.0148568991511 90% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2311.0 2732.02544248 85% => OK
No of words: 417.0 452.878318584 92% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54196642686 6.0361032391 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.58838876751 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.280575539568 0.366273622748 77% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.194244604317 0.280924506359 69% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.139088729017 0.200843997647 69% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.083932853717 0.132149295362 64% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34247029882 2.79330140395 84% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 219.290929204 91% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479616306954 0.48968727796 98% => OK
Word variations: 52.4956191087 55.4138127331 95% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6194690265 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.85 23.380412469 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6908673301 59.4972553346 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.55 141.124799967 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.85 23.380412469 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.4 0.674092028746 59% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.21349557522 134% => OK
Readability: 40.2744604317 51.4728631049 78% => OK
Elegance: 1.84545454545 1.64882698954 112% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.526524913295 0.391690518653 134% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.118779938779 0.123202303941 96% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0807130707166 0.077325440228 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.575524922815 0.547984918172 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.146079362258 0.149214159877 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.219361760024 0.161403998019 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.098983800582 0.0892212321368 111% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.453282685265 0.385218514788 118% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0605351499925 0.0692045440612 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.370205757864 0.275328986314 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354574822798 0.0653680567796 54% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.4325221239 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88274336283 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 7.22455752212 125% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.70907079646 185% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.5995575221 118% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.