Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state.
Nature has been at the receiving end due to economic developments in the last decade. In the quest to grow at a rapid pace, nations hardly pay attention to conserve the environment. Wilderness areas are sold to the corporate giants for setting up their operating units. Many urban civilizations are established by deforesting the unused locations. A considerable harm has already been done to the environment by the activities of human beings, better exemplified by the GREEN HOUSE EFFECT.
Nature is the best friend of a person. Wilderness areas are a place of joy for everyone. They are a perfect destination for people seeking some respite from the noise and haste of daily life. One gets rejuvenated in the company of nature. Apart from that, people can participate in various outdoor activities like river rafting, fishing, trekking and many more to list.
Wilderness plays a pivotal role in our daily life. It provides us with fresh air to breathe. We get clean water to drink. Vegetation is also provided by nature. In fact, our survival is dependent on the wilderness areas. Forests are home to animals. Deforesting imposes a threat on the survival of many endangered species. Biological cycle gets disturbed by causing harm to nature.
Many tribal communities live in the dense forest areas. By destroying wilderness, their culture and civilization are prone to become extinct. Getting rid of wilderness areas has a direct impact on their survival.
Hence, it is very important to frame laws that can save remaining wilderness areas. Existence of human beings is impossible without mother nature. It is our duty to protect the natural resources, not only for our own well being but for the future generations too.
- The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position 58
- Claim: Researchers should not limit their investigations to only those areas in which they expect to discover something that has an immediate, practical application.Reason: It is impossible to predict the outcome of a line of research with any certainty.W 58
- The general welfare of a nation's people is a better indication of that nation's greatness than are the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In d 58
- In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should be required to step down after five years.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing a 58
- The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting you 68
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'hence', 'if', 'so', 'well', 'apart from', 'in fact']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.261829652997 0.240241500013 109% => OK
Verbs: 0.170347003155 0.157235817809 108% => OK
Adjectives: 0.123028391167 0.0880659088768 140% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0315457413249 0.0497285424764 63% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0410094637224 0.0444667217837 92% => OK
Prepositions: 0.116719242902 0.12292977631 95% => OK
Participles: 0.0662460567823 0.0406280797675 163% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.83104503827 2.79330140395 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0410094637224 0.030933414821 133% => OK
Particles: 0.00315457413249 0.0016655270985 189% => OK
Determiners: 0.0820189274448 0.0997080785238 82% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00630914826498 0.0249443105267 25% => Some modal verbs wanted.
WH_determiners: 0.00315457413249 0.0148568991511 21% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1730.0 2732.02544248 63% => OK
No of words: 284.0 452.878318584 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.09154929577 6.0361032391 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.58838876751 89% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.369718309859 0.366273622748 101% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.285211267606 0.280924506359 102% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.193661971831 0.200843997647 96% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.147887323944 0.132149295362 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83104503827 2.79330140395 101% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 219.290929204 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616197183099 0.48968727796 126% => OK
Word variations: 68.6917750885 55.4138127331 124% => OK
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6194690265 116% => OK
Sentence length: 11.8333333333 23.380412469 51% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.1009585949 59.4972553346 51% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.0833333333 141.124799967 51% => OK
Words per sentence: 11.8333333333 23.380412469 51% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.333333333333 0.674092028746 49% => More Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.21349557522 0% => OK
Readability: 40.3544600939 51.4728631049 78% => OK
Elegance: 1.83116883117 1.64882698954 111% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212754782223 0.391690518653 54% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0608386045046 0.123202303941 49% => Sentence sentence coherence is low.
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0566805906072 0.077325440228 73% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.443575013011 0.547984918172 81% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.122704885538 0.149214159877 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0725627433012 0.161403998019 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604730909359 0.0892212321368 68% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.220111791639 0.385218514788 57% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0669826008487 0.0692045440612 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141763371615 0.275328986314 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436715729498 0.0653680567796 67% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.4325221239 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88274336283 205% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 7.0 7.22455752212 97% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 2.70907079646 221% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 13.5995575221 125% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.