Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The ecological balance of the planet has to be maintained for the earth to continue sustaining life. The prompt has presented a claim in favor of this fact, hence, I completely agree with it and argue that lawmakers have to bring in stringent measures to protect the declining biodiversity.
To begin with, the increasing human activities have had a debilitating effect on the climate of the planet. This has not positively impacted the biosphere. For instance, before the arrival of democracy, most countries on the planet was governed by monarchial governments. The kings who ruled these countries hunted many species of fauna into extinction. This affected the food chain that these animals were part of and led to the extinction of other animals belonging to the food chain. This disruption, hence, can ultimately lead to the destruction of the biosphere. These types of activities have not been completely stopped over time. Hence lawmakers as responsible leaders of the modern world, have to pass laws to prevent such extinctions, which can help in stabilizing the ecosystem.
Further, laws help the citizens of a country to lead peaceful and just lives. Without laws, a society can be pushed into anarchy. For example, during recent times the parliament of India passed a law that prevents the thorough analysis of a candidate's background before he appears for legislative elections. Due to this parliament is now filled with criminals who do not have any sense of righteousness and have no characteristics that are expected of a lawmaker. If the lawmakers themselves are criminals, the state of a country is impossible to imagine. The same thing can be applied to biodiversity. If nature is not conserved by strict laws, the citizens might destroy it and ruin things for future generations.
However, one might argue that human interference with the natural way of functioning of nature might hamper with the evolutionary processes existent in the ecosystem. For example, isolating a group of animals from the rest of the planet may make them susceptible to various diseases, leading to their deaths. This causal effect is not as debilitating as evil men destroying the biodiversity. Hence, nations should make laws to protect the environment at all costs to prevent the loss of biodiversity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 639, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... not been completely stopped over time. Hence lawmakers as responsible leaders of the...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 502, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts to prevent the loss of biodiversity.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, may, so, as to, for example, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1942.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 374.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19251336898 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0045434439 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 215.323595506 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548128342246 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 609.3 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.5813275729 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4761904762 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8095238095 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.61904761905 5.21951772744 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119900989278 0.243740707755 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0306735262289 0.0831039109588 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0305752923899 0.0758088955206 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0730721912735 0.150359130593 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0158852683812 0.0667264976115 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.