Some international companies are very powerful now and many people believe that it is negative development. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your reasons and relevant examples.
Today, some modern world companies have reached such altitudes which allow them to be very potent in the world of business and to be almost independent from governments. It is thought by some people that such achievements are harmful for society and bring only negative impact. I can’t agree with this statement, as advantages of contemporary huge enterprises are very significant, especially in Ukraine.
To begin with, immense companies have been always a good opportunity for youth to start their career. Such companies always have specialists’ shortage, which could be filled by newcomers from university or another educational facility. Secondly, huge organizations allow people to represent their abilities in order to get a promotion. Usually, these companies have own branches in foreign countries and successful workers are likely to participate in exchange programs and visit another country. To give a clear example, two years ago my friend’s daughter Ann after university completion got a job in international company “Arcellor Mital”. This company was originally created in India. Nowadays, it has its branches among the world. Ann has been working there for one year and company’s manager proposed her a new vacancy in Argentina. As a result, she has a good opportunity to broad her horizons in knowledge and see a new beautiful country.
Nevertheless, international companies have some drawbacks, which can be harmful. Firstly, the small local businesses could be superseded by huge enterprises, because they have significant budget advertise their services or products. Contemporary system of advertisement can impact people and sorry to say, small companies can’t afford to hire a good advertiser or PR manager. Secondly, sometimes high-developed enterprises can avoid their responsibilities. Thus, one of the managers of Ukrainian Metinvest company could avoid punishment for unacceptable working conditions on the factory.
In conclusion, international companies have its own disadvantaged, however the advantages overweigh them. These companies allow to develop their abilities and significantly benefit our society
- The idea of having a single career is becoming an old fashioned one. The new fashion will be to have several careers or ways of earning money and further education will be something that continues throughout life. 84
- A University should accept male and female students equally in every subject.To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement? 84
- Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful, others disagree. Discuss both the vie 68
- Some people trust their first impressions about a person’s character because they believe these judgments are generally correct. Other people do not judge a person’s character quickly because they believe first impressions are often wrong. 87
- Some people get into debt by buying things they don’t need and can’t afford. What are the reasons for this behaviour? What action can be taken to prevent people from having this problem? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 129, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'developing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: developing
...s overweigh them. These companies allow to develop their abilities and significantly benef...
^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'firstly', 'however', 'if', 'nevertheless', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'thus', 'in conclusion', 'as a result', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.270341207349 0.247107183377 109% => OK
Verbs: 0.141732283465 0.155533422707 91% => OK
Adjectives: 0.10498687664 0.0946595960268 111% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0446194225722 0.0501214627716 89% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0472440944882 0.0437548338989 108% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0892388451444 0.122226691241 73% => OK
Participles: 0.0236220472441 0.0403226058552 59% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.37970871382 2.80594681477 120% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0314960629921 0.0326793684256 96% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0629921259843 0.0861772015684 73% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0209973753281 0.021408717616 98% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00787401574803 0.011925033212 66% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2174.0 1933.35771543 112% => OK
No of words: 319.0 316.048096192 101% => OK
Chars per words: 6.81504702194 6.12580529183 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20517956788 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.435736677116 0.374742101984 116% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.382445141066 0.28420135186 135% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.30407523511 0.203846283523 149% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.241379310345 0.137316102897 176% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37970871382 2.80594681477 120% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.037074148 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598746081505 0.56093040696 107% => OK
Word variations: 67.6423609728 60.7387585426 111% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0891783567 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.7894736842 20.7743622355 81% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.363643161 49.517814964 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.421052632 127.492653851 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7894736842 20.7743622355 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.631578947368 0.814263465372 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.99599198397 25% => OK
Readability: 55.0339877908 49.1944974215 112% => OK
Elegance: 1.6404494382 1.69124875643 97% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187177414903 0.332605444948 56% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0678215626484 0.102741220458 66% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0474583217828 0.0668466124924 71% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.424354624954 0.534860350844 79% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.119629507887 0.148594505496 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0645714458459 0.134430193775 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550717552032 0.0742795772207 74% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.216463539224 0.324371583561 67% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0564119061956 0.0638462369009 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133159948424 0.228012699653 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0666745556542 0.058150111329 115% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.68436873747 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.41683366733 88% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 5.90881763527 135% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.5751503006 116% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 1.9629258517 51% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 10.4468937876 115% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.