The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Observation is the first step to innovation. Having passionate interest in commonplace things, definitely gives birth to some of the best ideas. Passion is a kind of motivational force for an individual. However, many great ideas, say in terms of science, have been majorly reliant on theoretical studies. So, it would be too absolute to credit only "interest in commonplace things" as the sole generator of innovative ideas.
Let me first exemplify how close observation of commonplace things has led to wonderful discoveries. When Swiss engineer Mestral returned from hunting in 1941, he saw his dog covered with burdock burrs. On magnifying one, he saw a hook like design that could nimbly attach to socks or fur. In this way, he invented Velcro, which is till date regarded as the most successful instance of bio mimicry. Another group of engineers from Arnold Glass in Germany contributed to an amazing invention. Spiders protect their web with the help of silk threads that reflect ultraviolet rays. These rays help birds in recognizing the web as an obstacle and prevent them from accidentally bumping into the web. Now, the engineers coated the glass walls of the building with a web like design that reflected UV rays. Thus, birds got saved from having a collision with the glass.
Conversely, many scientific inventions are result of the rigorous study that scientists do. Tao - Green theorem, was invented by collaboration of two great scientists. Darwin's theory, Einstein's theory of relativity are some examples that have nothing to do with commonplace things.
To sum up, yes, ideas do spring from having passion in commonplace things. But, apart from passion, there are other factors like intense study relating to a field, that also contribute towards innovation.
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals 58
- Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well-being of the societies and environments in which they operate. Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations, provided they operate within the law, is to make as 58
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. 66
- In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should be required to step down after five years. 16
- The general welfare of a nation's people is a better indication of that nation's greatness than are the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In d 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 350, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... it would be too absolute to credit only apos;interest in commonplace things apos...
^^
Line 5, column 96, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e rigorous study that scientists do. Tao Green theorem, was invented by collabora...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, however, if, so, thus, apart from, kind of, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 14.8657303371 13% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1516.0 2235.4752809 68% => OK
No of words: 291.0 442.535393258 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20962199313 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8020299103 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 215.323595506 90% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.66323024055 0.4932671777 134% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 704.065955056 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.0952501982 60.3974514979 38% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.7894736842 118.986275619 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3157894737 23.4991977007 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36842105263 5.21951772744 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127382712348 0.243740707755 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.037745352227 0.0831039109588 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038721393889 0.0758088955206 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0772326989178 0.150359130593 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0273111456903 0.0667264976115 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 48.8420337079 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.