TPO 43
Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.
•Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leade.
•Say nothing.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Without any shadow of a doubt, having interaction with others in society is one of the most prominent needs and trends which is embedded in people's sprit. Should people realize the importance of this element, they will ponder over its quality much more scrupulously. Some people are inclined towards the idea that if anyone makes a mistake, accidentally or intentionally, it is better to hint him/her to adjust the error immediately, while others believe that mentioning the problem in the crowded place is not decent treatment, whereas this mistake would rooted in the audience's misunderstanding. I do find the idea of the later group more in accordance with that of mine. To support my stance, in the course of this essay, I will aptly substantiate my viewpoints.
To begin with, interrupting the class or meeting to correct the mistake not only takes the practical time of the class, but also it would be boring for the others. On the other hand, coming up this topic in that climate may lead to a conflict between of two sides, thereby there would not be enough time to persuade each others. Take a personal experience as an example; back in high school, once my chemistry teacher did not express precise information about the statistics results of a study which was conducted in physics lab, in his class. After that, supervisor who oversaw that study argued with him among the students, which not only leaded to a terrible confliction but also we missed the educational time of the class. And now just imagine that condition, is it logically acceptable to express his own idea among the others and have such irrational behavior? Obviously, the answer to this question in itself indicates that respect other's notion is necessary, no matter how much other opinion is far from his/her.
Another reason which deserves to say some words here is that coming up the debate after the metting or whenever that there are adequate time for discussion, provide the opportunities to have a constructive discussion which gives the chance to learn more and increase their knowledge. Having different viewpoints is the inextricable interweaving with any community, managing this opportunity will provide abundant headways not only for the individual but also for the society. Thus, it is better to take advantage of this favorable circumstance and increase their awarness. For instance, my father, which the chief executive officer of a well-known company, once stated that he would not have been able to teach his current success and prosperity if he had not had promoting conversations with his oppenent when he was a employee in a ordinary firm. He further explained that he was able to take advantage of their notions in regard of his flourishing.
In brief, by contemplating the aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that neither ignoring others mistake nor interrupting their speech in front of the others have promising influence of the development community. I strongly subscribe to the idea there would be more emphasis on decent argument to enhance the level of motivation in the society, college class or academic conferences.
- Some people prefer to eat at food stands or restaurants. Other people prefer to prepare and eat food at home. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Tpo 42 81
- TPO 40 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 557, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'root'
Suggestion: root
...t treatment, whereas this mistake would rooted in the audiences misunderstanding. I do...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 819, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ersations with his oppenent when he was a employee in a ordinary firm. He further...
^
Line 5, column 833, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... his oppenent when he was a employee in a ordinary firm. He further explained tha...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, thus, well, whereas, while, for instance, in brief, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2627.0 1977.66487455 133% => OK
No of words: 516.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09108527132 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76609204519 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86548882922 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 284.0 212.727598566 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550387596899 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 834.3 618.680645161 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.492700341 48.9658058833 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.944444444 100.406767564 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6666666667 20.6045352989 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0862586942034 0.236089414692 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0275128634349 0.076458572812 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0369671286183 0.0737576698707 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0514770950688 0.150856017488 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278315638515 0.0645574589148 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 11.7677419355 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 58.1214874552 74% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.01818996416 118% => OK
difficult_words: 144.0 86.8835125448 166% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes. We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.