It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The author of the issue highlights that in order to define ourselves, we should make a relation with social groups due to the fact that we provide an opportunity to identify our hallmarks. Due to the controversial nature of this question there is not a general argument on this issue. I am, however, to a great extent of the conviction that communicate with social groups not only can patronize us to detect our potential but also can enhance our social skills. In the ensuing paragraphs some convincing reason will be delineated to elaborate my personal stance.
To commence with, it is established beyond doubt that relationship provide an opportunity for people to examine themselves and investigate their characters or in other word, it is the best way to become familiar with inside's potentials. Broadly speaking, social groups whether in the society or in internet networks provide a great chance for people to measure their social skills and realize to the extent they are sociable. As a matter of fact, relationship play an important role in people's lives and could have great or deleterious effects on our characteristics. To elucidate more on this issue, when people make a relation with others or social groups, it means that they share almost all part of their lives and in this case, people are able to define themselves because vast majorities of ideas are shared in these groups. As a tangible example, researcher have shown that a large number of people who share their opinion and life with social groups, are able to measure and identify their potentials and use them in real world.
Another reason that should not go unnoticed is that people will enhance their social skills while socialize with groups. Generally phrased, a plethora of people are shy in their personal life and are introverted people who spend most of their valuable time in solitude. As far as I am concerned, identification with social groups not only can improve our social relation but also can contribute greatly to examine ourselves. Delve further into the issue, enhancement of social skills in one of the utmost important problem, which not until people develop it can they progress and identify themselves.
However, what I alluded to above can't be overgeneralized to all contexts. Alongside with the innumerable benefits it has, indisputably, almost all people are mature enough to identify and define themselves. Indeed, socialize with social groups not only can mislead people but also can destroy people's personality due to the fact that in social groups every person has its own idea and adapting with various opinion might have deleterious effects on people's personal lives.
In light of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that socialize with social group could not have deleterious impact on people behavior and will provide an opportunity for people to examine themselves and measure their ability, instead.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | jason123 | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-30 | Vaibhav Panchal | 58 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | Persian Moonlight | 70 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | raolitesh@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2019-08-28 | pankajsolanki4007 | 50 | view |
- humans' mind is superior to the machines. do you agree or disagree? 66
- People have different ways of escaping the stress and difficulties of modern life. What do you think is the best way of reducing stress? 73
- Do you agree or disagree that progress is always good? 86
- TPO 49,2 88
- Nowadays food has become easier to prepare Has this change improved the way people live 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 882, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ble example, researcher have shown that a large number of people who share their opinion and life...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 34, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...s. However, what I alluded to above cant be overgeneralized to all contexts. Alo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, while, broadly speaking, as a matter of fact, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 33.0505617978 163% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2447.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 476.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14075630252 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67091256922 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76835201195 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.466386554622 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 786.6 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.740449438202 270% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7503704582 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.941176471 118.986275619 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 23.4991977007 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35294117647 5.21951772744 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19357919402 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751108915966 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540113411387 0.0758088955206 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132911527807 0.150359130593 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0294338089159 0.0667264976115 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 14.1392134831 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 48.8420337079 71% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.