Do you agree or disagree?in 20 years from now on, students will not use printed books any more .
The question is whether in 20 years from now on, students will not use printed books any more or not. Everyone in consideration to his private vantage point can maintain a specific direction toward this surmise, however I am willing to affirm this idea will become to reality. My arguments and reasons are listed below which will strengthen my point of view:
To begin with, Needless to say that technology has changed the world. Anything which was being imagined to be impossible nowadays is plausible. The sophisticated companies are providing the equipped tools and devices for more welfare. For instance, in recent years some iPods have been designed based on ancient tablets. These devices are not only light and compact, but also they have a great capacity for saving data. Inasmuch people are always looking for more comfort; it is obvious that books will be replaced with iPods and their new version.
The second reason why I advocate this idea lies in the fact of saving money. Despite of the hug mass of paper, it is still very expensive at least in my country; hence students and their family will would rather electric devices than a lot of books. Today's education system uses a book for every major and if we considerate to the cost of consumable paper in country, it can be disappointing. Instead of paying money for paper, people will be able to spend their budget for indispensable things like buying high speed of internet, purchasing accounts for downloading and a lot of other things for getting information faster.
I am inclined to empower my arguments by following discussion. Now people are aware toward their environment more than past. As we all know global warming are increasing extremely, consequently more books is equal more deforestation. Nobody could overlook the destructive effects of heating of Earth on natural environment, humans and animals.
By taking all above mentioned arguments, I strongly believe that the books will be reduced in future as now their electric versions of them are accessible and cost effective.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-12-11 | peerless alex | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. 81
- Do you agree or disagree with this sentence?in the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better to make decision about their lives 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future. 90
- do you agree or disagree?To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. 88
- tpo44 60
Comments
Essay evaluation report
These devices are not only light and compact, but also they have a great capacity for saving data.
Description: 'Not only...but also' is not used properly. can you re-write this sentence?
As we all know global warming are increasing extremely, consequently more books is equal
As we all know the global warming is increasing extremely, consequently more books are equal
Sentence: Today's education system uses a book for every major and if we considerate to the cost of consumable paper in country, it can be disappointing.
Description: A pronoun, personal, nominative, not 3rd person singular is not usually followed by an adjective
Suggestion: Refer to we and considerate
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 23 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 342 350
No. of Characters: 1679 1500
No. of Different Words: 212 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.3 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.909 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.618 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 121 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 93 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 58 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 33 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.874 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.444 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.27 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.415 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.053 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, look, second, so, still, then, at least, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1724.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 342.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04093567251 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70260865966 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625730994152 0.524837075471 119% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5174001005 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.411764706 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1176470588 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64705882353 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234572853674 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0785876063637 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144092673417 0.0737576698707 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131910580803 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100001053532 0.0645574589148 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.