When you are assigned an important presentation at work or in school, you prefer to work on it right away so that you can work on it a little bit every day, or wait till you have a good idea?
One of the most influential factor which leads to success is well organized schedule. Having an exact and step by step what-to-do program everyday makes jobs easier. A perfect presentation involves many intellectual and aesthetic parameters. I personally prefer to be prepared for a presentation at least one week before the due date. This has advantages in managing time to an elaborated design, preparation for the speech and having enough time to provide the novel key point in the presentation.
To begin with, design of the presentation slides should be in a good compatibility with the context which is presented. Kind of the theme and colors chosen for the slides should be in a good harmony with the subject. For instance, if the presentation is about marine biology, the matching style is the spectacular scenes of deep oceans. Adornment of slides is a time consuming work which has to be carefully done.
Secondly, clearly speaking in the presentation makes the topic more fascinating. When someone talks about a particular subject so enthusiastically, it allures the audiences and make them focus on the talk. The lecturer should have a good proficiency in the subject and be very well oriented as well. Moreover, skills to attract the audiences attention are hard to learn, It takes time and it’s not practical to do in one day.
Thirdly, good ideas trigger over time. When someone goes about a specific job, places in he context of that job, makes his or her mind totally obsessed which helps to have a wider scope of thought. As a result, brainstorm occurs more rapidly and efficiently. For example when I’m making presentation slides, I start with reading articles and passages about different aspects of the topic. The new ideas appear suddenly when thinking about the subject over days. Sleeping is another factor which classifies thoughts, thus one is better in giving ideas after sufficient sleep.
To put in nutshell, starting working and scheduling on works increases the quality and efficiency. This fosters some skills in the lecturer and even makes a dull topic an interesting one.
- Some items can be made by hand or by machine. Which do you prefer- items made by hand or items made by machine? Use resoans and examples. 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Though people already realized the importance of protecting the environment, it's unlikely that there'll be any difference. 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The government should support scientific research that does not have any practical use in the short term 95
- Do you agree or not Because people are busy doing so many things they do very few things well 68
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? University should spend more money supporting social activities rather than improving the canteen food. 97
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 139, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...act and step by step what-to-do program everyday makes jobs easier. A perfect presentati...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 332, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'audiences'' or 'audience's'?
Suggestion: audiences'; audience's
...s well. Moreover, skills to attract the audiences attention are hard to learn, It takes t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 87, Rule ID: HE_THE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'in the context'?
Suggestion: in the context
...meone goes about a specific job, places in he context of that job, makes his or her mind tota...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, well, as to, at least, for example, for instance, kind of, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 30.3222958057 158% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1772.0 1373.03311258 129% => OK
No of words: 348.0 270.72406181 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09195402299 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86293436577 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 145.348785872 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580459770115 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 419.366225166 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 2.0 0.116997792494 1709% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 13.0662251656 161% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5498366118 49.2860985944 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.380952381 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5714285714 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.80952380952 7.06452816374 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 4.33554083885 392% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136634239923 0.272083759551 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0406992893594 0.0996497079465 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0325621755137 0.0662205650399 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.079546785677 0.162205337803 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0215992770943 0.0443174109184 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.3589403974 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 63.6247240618 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.