Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Face-to-face communication is better than other types of communication, such as letters, E-mail, or telephone calls. Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.
Nowadays, in the time of modern technology we have more opportunities to talk to people even if they are far away from us. Using the Internet we can send e-mails, make calls in Skype or chat on Facebook. But some people claim that all these cannot replace live conversations in real life, because such talks are much better. As for me, I agree that face-to-face meetings are better than communication via the Internet or post letters.
The first reason why I think so is that to keep really warm relationship with my friends and my relatives I heed to see their faces and smiles. Of course, using Skype or other similar services I can see the face of a person I talk to. But for me it is important to have the ability to make an embrace or to kiss on cheek by welcoming my mom or dad.
Also, real conversations are better than internet ones in the case when we only make an acquaintance. Very often people in the Internet can lie and be online completely other persons. I have a friend who used to make a friend in the Internet. Once she fell in love with one guy, whom she met on Facebook, but when they met in real life, she realized he was really boring for her.
The last reason why I prefer real meetings over sending letters is time. Of course, now it takes a few minutes to send a message on Facebook, but the person, who you sent a message to, may answer this very long. During face-to-face conversations I know that there are only two persons involved in the process of chatting: for example, my friend or my mom and me. Also, if I ask a question, I will get the answer on it immediately.
To sum up, I think face-to-face communication is better than letters or e-mails, because it give me real emotions.
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific methods proposed in the reading passage. 3
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 50
- Educational institutions should dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and su 50
- Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon. On the other hand, conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would be impossible.First, atmospheric 80
- The United Kingdom sometimes referred to as Britain has a long and rich history of human settlement Traces of buildings tools and art can be found from periods going back many thousands of years from the Stone Age through the Bronze Age the Iron Age the t 12
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Nowadays, in the time of modern technolo...
^^
Line 7, column 94, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'gives'?
Suggestion: gives
...ter than letters or e-mails, because it give me real emotions.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, really, so, as for, for example, i think, of course, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1406.0 1977.66487455 71% => OK
No of words: 320.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.39375 4.8611393121 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61855607874 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 212.727598566 81% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540625 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 618.680645161 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.994623655914 201% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.800348469 48.9658058833 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.875 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5625 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202963643446 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683588918983 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0727545385917 0.0737576698707 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124446907728 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468044610708 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.18 10.9000537634 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.19 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 86.8835125448 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.