Originality does not mean thinking something that was never thought before; it means putting old ideas together in new ways.
The base of the pyramid supports all the structure above it, similarly some unique idea is required to support other ideas. We cannot say that originality is just putting old ideas together. There is not a single definition of originality that can encompass all the meanings of it. In a nutshell, it is something new, useful, and interesting and is a basis for many other inventions. It can be inventing new things or just putting old ideas together in a novel way. I will provide some examples and will shed more light on this topic in the passage below.
In my opinion, originality also means unwrapping some mystery and coming up with unique thoughts. Everyone knows about satellites and how they are helping to revolutionize the technological world, society, and humankind around us. Rocket propulsion is the main part of Satellites launching procedure and is not an merely an amalgam of some ideas put together in some fashionable form. It is something that was never thought before and is something new and innovative. Hence, we can say that new ideas are required to come up with other inventions in the future and are true originality. Just just putting old ideas together is not the only definition of an Originality.
Furthermore, we can see example of Facebook and other social networks. These correctly fit into the definition of originality mentioned in the statement as they just came with the old idea of social networks differently. But, there was existing original idea of social network that was developed by AOL which helped in development of these new websites. As, it is evident that novel ideas are required for development of other ideas and originality also means thinking completely new things.
There are other places where humankind came up with new things by putting old ideas together, but these ideas were not merely developed by putting some stuff together in a cutting edge way. These were real, path-breaking ideas which helped in the development of other inventions. Everyone knows about internet, we use it daily more than anything else. It was invented by DARPA as ARPNET for military purpose. Now we are using it for totally different purpose. As we can again see, internet was developed by putting old idea came up by DARPA, but DARPA's idea is the base and was entirely novel and is a true original stuff.
It is apparent by now that originality means putting some old ideas together in new way and also coming up with new groundbreaking things. I disagree with the definition of Originality mentioned in the statement give in the question.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-02 | amruta3097 | 50 | view |
| 2019-09-19 | nkuruppath641@gmail.com | 50 | view |
| 2019-09-19 | nkuruppath641@gmail.com | 50 | view |
| 2019-07-26 | mb94 | 33 | view |
| 2019-02-17 | devjoshi | 57 | view |
- Originality does not mean thinking something that was never thought before; it means putting old ideas together in new ways. 50
- Originality does not mean thinking something that was never thought before; it means putting old ideas together in new ways. 50
- “When the Apogee Company had all its operations in one location, it was more profitablethan it is today. Therefore, the Apogee Company should close down its field offices andconduct all its operations from a single location. Such centralization would im 66
- A recent study with a researcher pretending to have a broken down car on the side of the road showed that when the researcher was a man,60% of the time, a man pulled over to help them, and 0% of the time a woman stopped to help. When the researcher was a 66
- Originality does not mean thinking something that was never thought before; it means putting old ideas together in new ways. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 451, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a novel way" with adverb for "novel"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ings or just putting old ideas together in a novel way. I will provide some examples and will ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 312, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...tellites launching procedure and is not an merely an amalgam of some ideas put tog...
^^
Line 3, column 588, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: Just
...in the future and are true originality. Just just putting old ideas together is not the o...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, similarly, so, as to, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2155.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 436.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94266055046 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56953094068 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77981935235 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 215.323595506 88% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.433486238532 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 723.6 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6306038478 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.7916666667 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1666666667 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.91666666667 5.21951772744 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.83258426966 248% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372084707843 0.243740707755 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113296953882 0.0831039109588 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0969507533413 0.0758088955206 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241316263264 0.150359130593 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328007474454 0.0667264976115 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 14.1392134831 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.