Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should be paid according to how much their students learn. Give specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
Measuring teacher's performance is a controversial issue in educational system. Since the modern educational system established, educational experts tried to pay teacher's salary based on their efficiency. One the factors that they noticed is student's learning rate. Although some the experts believed that teachers are hired to teach students and their performance should be measured by student's learning rate, I think that this is non-logical and unfair strategy. In following sections, you can see my explanations that why I disagree with this proposal.
Frist of all, every student has a different rate to learn courses, then, there is no guarantee that all students learn what teachers try to teach them. Student's intelligence, which is a crucial factor in learning, is dependent to several factors such as genetics, nutrition, psychological, etc. For example, my friend had some problem with his father. His father was drunk addicted and always punished him due to choppy issues. So, he couldn't concentrate on class and failed in most of his courses. Thus, low grades of my friend isn't his teacher's fault.
Second, teachers learning ability couldn't be measured by quantitative parameters; it is qualitative. We can't say that becasue half of the class got grades above the A, so this teacher is good teacher and should be paid higher than others. If other half got C and lower than what would be interpretation. So, It is hard to define a good teacher by measuring their what they student's learn.
Third, the quality of school and the area that student's come from is effective in their performance. Some schools that are located in rich and developed areas are facilitate to latest technologies in educational section, help students to learn thing and increase their performance. So, by considering this perspective, teachers of these student's should pay higher than teachers that haven't access to these technologies.
To sum up, I believe that paying teachers based on their student's learning isn't logical as I discussed the reasons above. If we want to perform such policies, we should try to improve all schools and students to the same level of others which is impossible. Furthermore, provide a fair quantitative formula to calculate teacher's performance and finally, teachers should regard all student's differences in personality traits, social and economical conditions during test of what they learning.
- You need to travel from your home to a place 40 miles 64 kilometers away Compare the different kinds of transportation you could use Tell which method of travel you would choose Give specific reasons for your choice 83
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- TPO 40 80
- TPO 25 Integrated 90
- TPO 42 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 162, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...ished, educational experts tried to pay teachers salary based on their efficiency. One t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 260, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to rate'
Suggestion: to rate
... that they noticed is students learning rate. Although some the experts believed tha...
^^^^
Line 1, column 305, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Although some the experts believed that teachers are hired to teach students and...
^^
Line 3, column 436, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...nished him due to choppy issues. So, he couldnt concentrate on class and failed in most...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 530, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
... courses. Thus, low grades of my friend isnt his teachers fault. Second, teachers...
^^^^
Line 5, column 35, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...t. Second, teachers learning ability couldnt be measured by quantitative parameters;...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 105, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ative parameters; it is qualitative. We cant say that becasue half of the class got ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 164, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'facilitated'.
Suggestion: facilitated
...located in rich and developed areas are facilitate to latest technologies in educational s...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 175, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the latest'.
Suggestion: to the latest
...rich and developed areas are facilitate to latest technologies in educational section, he...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 384, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...ts should pay higher than teachers that havent access to these technologies. To sum...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 76, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...achers based on their students learning isnt logical as I discussed the reasons abov...
^^^^
Line 9, column 437, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...ences in personality traits, social and economical conditions during test of what they lea...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, if, second, so, then, third, thus, for example, i think, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2042.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 385.0 407.700716846 94% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3038961039 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94031710283 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1972985948 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2380952381 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61904761905 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 5.5376344086 217% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257324152194 0.236089414692 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0795464630723 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500224066142 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151745069155 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401712349624 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.