Many people say that we have developed into a “throw-away”
culture, because we are filling up our environment with so many
plastic bags and rubbish that we cannot fully dispose of. To what
extent do you agree with this opinion and what measures can you
recommend reducing this problem?
Nowadays people produce more waste than ever, as they are accustomed to a “throw-away” lifestyle. And it’s become worst as they generate wastes which are difficult to be disposed. I personally agree with the statement and the following essay will explain it in details.
To begin with, as the world economic has developed, people generate more waste each year. With the mass industrialization, costs of producing products such as the plastic bottle or disposable diapers are getting lower than ever. As a result, lots of people prefer to use these kinds of products, as they believe that these items are more efficient and hygiene. However, they do not realize that these products have a catastrophic effect on the environment. It is very difficult to recycle these items, as it requires for more than a century to dispose of them. Consequently, people require more landfills these days which will reduce the number of green areas.
However, to resolve the issue, we could change the habits of purchasing non-environmentally friendly products. For example, instead of buying mineral water that is packed in the plastic bottle, we could use a glass bottle that can be repeatedly used. In terms of recycling, the glass bottle is easier than the plastic one and safer for the human’s health as well. It has been reported that plastic bottles could cause cancers and other kinds of serious diseases. Another example would be to use a paper bag or a permanent bag as a substitution of plastic bags. By changing these kinds of lifestyle, it is hoped that we could reduce the number of nondisposable waste in the area.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that people generate more waste these days, as they have a “throw-away” habit. And it gets worst, as many of the waste are nondisposable. I strongly agree with the statement, and we should change this negative lifestyle immediately.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-27 | quynhhuong656 | 70 | view |
| 2018-04-12 | minhtu21 | 73 | view |
- Students today can easily access information online so libraries are no longer necessary Do you agree or disagree 75
- Many people say that we have developed into a “throw-away”culture, because we are filling up our environment with so manyplastic bags and rubbish that we cannot fully dispose of. To whatextent do you agree with this opinion and what measures can your 77
- The charts below show the percentage water used for different purposed in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The only way to improve the safety on our own road is to have stricter punishment for driving offenders To what extent do you agree or disagree 54
- cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport. Why is it not popular in many places? And how to increase its popularity? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 73, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...te than ever, as they are accustomed to a 'throw-away' lifestyle. And i...
^
Line 7, column 90, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ate more waste these days, as they have a 'throw-away' habit. And it ge...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, so, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1050955414 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16911626523 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525477707006 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.6051297142 49.4020404114 40% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.0555555556 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4444444444 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203284871523 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0659764203962 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497405019477 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144786678491 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0661695964037 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.