The graph below shows the number of library books read by boys and girls at Starmouth School from 2011 to the present.
The graph shows the changes in number of library books read by boys and girls at Starmouth School from 2011 to present.
According to the graph, there were different trends over a six-year period. However, there has been almost a slight rise in numbers between 2011 and 2015.
Looking in more detail, it can be seen that during the first-four years, there were a dramatically rise from 2011 to 2015, from about 25 to 100 by girls. However, boys start off reading more books than girls, the pattern increased gradually, so the numbers similarly reached 100 in 2015. Between 2015 and 2017, although the number of books which have been read by boys have surprisingly declined to 80 in 2017, there were a significant increase in numbers for girls, reaching 140 in 2017.
Overall, there has been an extreme upward trend in number of books rates which are read by female students. Even though male students read more books between 2011 and 2015, interestingly, they have been getting away from girls in recent years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-01-21 | saeed saamaadii | 69 | view |
- Many people believe that formal "pen and paper" examinations are not the best method of assessing education achievement. Discuss this view and give your own opinion. 95
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 90
- Today, high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of society in which they are sold.To what extent do you agree or disagree. 69
- The graph below shows the number of library books read by boys and girls at Starmouth School from 2011 to the present 69
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 85, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('dramatically') instead an adjective, or a noun ('rise') instead of another adjective.
...during the first-four years, there were a dramatically rise from 2011 to 2015, from about 25 to 100...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, similarly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 846.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86206896552 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34955574688 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580459770115 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 225.0 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1477391204 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.75 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.417924706665 0.215688989381 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.208067593035 0.103423049105 201% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.254974498953 0.0843802449381 302% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.340110648058 0.15604864568 218% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.311862484948 0.0819641961636 380% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.