In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
It is extremely painstaking to make great breakthrough in any field of study. Any contributions require innovations, hard-working, stamina, enterprises and almost all kinds of qualities. From my perspective, it would be ponctitious to draw a conclusion that a beginner or an expert would be more likely to make important contributions.
First of all, the argument aquiesce that there does exist a clear difference between an expert and a novice. Nevertheless, an expert in a particular is nobody but a pile of experience through which he/she has gone. In the millieu of globalization currently, cross discipline study gain increasingly popularity and an expert in one field is probably striving to dabble into another, where he/she might be a novice because he/she lack sufficient experience. For instance, Donald Trump could be an expert in the market or economic field, but hardly one in political science. In this sense, it is no longer necessary to tell the difference between the expert and the rookie.
Even if we admit the gap between both, it is still difficult to determine who could make more achievement. As mentioned before, an expert has the advantage of valuable experience and prestigious reputation, which might hamper his or her research in a way, while a tyro may be more innovative and radical since he/she has nothing to lose. Thus, they have their own niches in different discipline. For instance, the politic stage would welcome experts who have better understanding of compromise and cooperation; a prestigious chef is more likely to make delicious dish; a programmer familiar with computer science can design better software. All these fields ask for glut of experience to be dexterous and proficient. Hence, experts are more probably to succeed.
However, when we take a look at the field like music and art, we would find a plethora of artists who make consummate achievement when they are actually beginners. Vincent Van Gogh is an indigent and obscure artist but panited the masterpiece "Starry Night"; when Langlang was admited to the best conservatory in China and became world-known, he was only a 17-year-old boy; Chengzhanggeng, a Chinese poet wrote his most well-known poem when he was an adolescent, even cannot master all the Chinese characters. Their talents, enterprises and peerless innovations as beginners are the very keys to their contribution.
In conclusion, what really counts should never be whom the person is but what characteristic the person possesses. Any one who is experienced and knowledgeable as an expert, innovative and intrepid as a beginner is promised to make important achievements in his or her field.
- The following appeared in a memo to the board of directors of a company that specializes in the delivery of heating oil."Most homes in the northeastern United States, where winters are typically cold, have traditionally used oil as their major fuel for he 66
- Some people believe that our ever-increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction. Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another.Write a res 70
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist."Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rat 66
- In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions. 66
- In order to become well-rounded individuals, all college students should be required to take courses in which they read poetry, novels, mythology, and other types of imaginative literature.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agre 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 429, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'lacks'.
Suggestion: lacks
...he/she might be a novice because he/she lack sufficient experience. For instance, Do...
^^^^
Line 10, column 116, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Anyone'?
Suggestion: Anyone
...at characteristic the person possesses. Any one who is experienced and knowledgeable as...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, hence, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, really, so, still, thus, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2260.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 429.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26806526807 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17223811157 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568764568765 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 711.9 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Interrogative: 4.0 0.740449438202 540% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.7935671409 60.3974514979 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.947368421 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5789473684 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.68421052632 5.21951772744 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289598879813 0.243740707755 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0914529072787 0.0831039109588 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.084651854599 0.0758088955206 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177528074303 0.150359130593 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0987246573783 0.0667264976115 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 100.480337079 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.