Some people think that children need to study in an environment where they have to compete with each other. Others, however, believe that teamwork is more important. Discuss both views and give your opinion
It has been argued that children nowadays have a variety of the opportunities to develop in theirs way such as directly rival with their friends or getting together with others to make a strong pond contrariwise. To the best of my knowledge, I totally agree with the establishment of teams.
Many people especially children's parents always have the thought that studying in a competitive atmosphere would have quite enormous effects on progression of studying of them. Every student would have a chance to perform and complete missions on his own and get the achievements by his selves only without any discussions or consultations. In addition, if a child contends to get the highest accomplishments when he was young, he will be easier to get the success in the future. For instance, a number of children in Vietnam take part in excellent competition, which anyone joins must do the test by his self, have great results.
In another way, the outcomes of group operations are becoming popular more and more. Firstly, it could help members to improve their awareness of carrying out and accomplishing their tasks perfectly before deadlines. Secondly, working in a team make people to have the chance to enjoy the group spirit. Of course, members would try their best in order not to make others disappointed. With the new members, they would have opportunities to get the experiences from elder brothers and sisters to be better in their areas. In recent times, there are a lot of immense inventions which are made by teenage teams have acknowledged by the experts around the world.
In conclusion, there is no denying that the young have an amount of advantages if studying in an compete environment. But, it seems to me that teamwork environment is better for learning .
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2017-02-04 | Ngangiang | 89 | view |
2017-01-28 | kingnight153 | 89 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f the opportunities to develop in theirs way such as directly rival with their fr...
^^
Line 1, column 214, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hers to make a strong pond contrariwise. To the best of my knowledge, I totally a...
^^
Line 1, column 269, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f my knowledge, I totally agree with the establishment of teams. Many people e...
^^
Line 7, column 95, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... an amount of advantages if studying in an compete environment. But, it seems to m...
^^
Line 7, column 95, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... an amount of advantages if studying in an compete environment. But, it seems to me that ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 143, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...te environment. But, it seems to me that teamwork environment is better for learn...
^^^
Line 7, column 189, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...mwork environment is better for learning .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, of course, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1498.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04377104377 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94569714342 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616161616162 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.947037508 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.230769231 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8461538462 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92307692308 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193416565815 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641644986442 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463006113903 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119100581403 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311116799644 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.