It is better to be a member of a group than to be a leader of a group. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
By and large, it is established beyond doubt that joining different groups could have provided an opportunity for people enhance their personal life like improving the relationship, skills, interaction and so forth. Stemming from this fact, a relevant question that is a moot point is whether being a leader is more useful and effective or being a member of a group. Due to the controversial nature of this question, there is not a general agreement on this issue. I am, however, to a great extent of the conviction that members in a group have always an easy task to do than leaders. In the following paragraphs, some convincing reasons will be delineated to elaborate my personal stance.
To commence with, there is no doubt that handle groups have various trials and tribulations and different difficulties might come up. Generally phrased, if people want to be a leader in a group, they should be responsible for many actions. Indeed, leaders should take the responsibility of different actions whether wrong or true. For instance, whenever some members do something wrong during their works, which run a group into a huge problem and create majorities of problems, indeed, leaders should take the responsibilities of those faults. This trend shows that it is incumbent upon leaders to handle and resolve the problems, which is not an easy task to do. To elucidate more on this issue, a plethora of people are not responsible for their acts and being a leader of a group could not be suitable for every human. In fact, being a leader need especial hallmarks like being talent, intelligence, skilled, knowledgeable, experienced and so forth.
Another reason that should not go unnoticed is that leaders might not have a healthy life. To put it in another word, a group may carry out majorities of works and leader is responsible for those works so, this situation should be stressful whether the works are done properly or not and leader will be overwhelmed by stress that is not healthy and may create some diseases. Going into the depth, although leaders play an important role in every group, members have lower stress and more time spends with others. However, being a leader will help people develop their social life and learn how to handle works or even how to interact with other people. As a matter of fact, being a leader could provide fertile ground for people to take the responsibility for their actions.
In light of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that all members in a group have the easy task to do with less responsibility and lower stress.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television has destroyed communication among friends and family. 8
- TPO24 85
- Neighbor are the people who live near us. In your opinion, what are the good quality of a good neighbor? 86
- it is primarily through identification with social groups that people define themselves. do you agree or disagree? 62
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives.Use specific reasons and examples to 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, for instance, in fact, no doubt, as a matter of fact, by and large, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2138.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 435.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91494252874 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76389725247 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468965517241 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 650.7 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6144125863 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.777777778 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1666666667 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94444444444 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359252126445 0.236089414692 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127837808174 0.076458572812 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732444142812 0.0737576698707 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241796017565 0.150856017488 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489643911595 0.0645574589148 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.