the pie charts shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and reveived in one year. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words
The pie charts illustrated the proportion of money that a charitable organization for children in the US spent and received during one-year period.
Overall, the total revenue that the organization got from several categories was higher than the total their expenditure. The main category that the charity received from was donated food. Meanwhile, they expensed the most on program services.
In details, donated food accounted for 86.6% of revenue sources. While the money that the charity got from community contributed to 10.4%, the proportion of program revenue was 2.2%. And in three remaining categories, there were small proportions. In which, the charity received a equal percentage from investment income and government grants, at only 0.2%. Finally, other income had 0.4% of total money they got.
With the charity's expenditure, the proportion of program services was 95,8%. In contrast, they just spent a small amount of money on program increasing their fund and management and general, at 2.6% and 16%, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-02-11 | Huyen Trang | 20 | view |
- the graph shows the oil production capacity in 6 countries between 1990 and 2010. 67
- The charts below show the level of participation in education and science in developing countries and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990. 73
- The charts below show the level of participation in education and science in developing countries and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990 62
- The charts below show the level of participation in education and science in developing countries and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990 91
- The charts below show the level of participation in education and science in developing countries and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 280, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ortions. In which, the charity received a equal percentage from investment income...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 880.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8362607426 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58125 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.1050879605 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.0 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5454545455 22.9334400587 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.27272727273 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13711575143 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507939272639 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571214056672 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0993850444747 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619240856583 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.3012195122 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.