Two bar chart show the food bought in three European countries in 1998 and 2008
he given bar charts compare the proportion of food and other items consumed by those living in Norway, Poland and UK in two period of time 1998 and 2008.
Overall, it is clear that there was a marginal increase in both food and other items throughout 10-year period in all three countries. Besides, noticeable information is that Norway citizens spent more money on food whereas other items were bought most by those in Poland.
As is presented from the chart, initially, in 1998, 15% of food was purchased by Norwegian, following by food consumption in Poland (at about 8%). Meanwhile, of all three countries, other items were most preferred in Poland as opposed to that of UK (approximately 12% and roundly 3% respectively). This trend remained unchanged after 10-year time, at 35% and about 18%.
Furthermore, food consuming was tripled in Norway and Poland while that of UK was five times within time given. Particularly, in UK, the money spending on both food and other items five folded over the period of 10 years, a rise of 20% and about 12% respectively. Also, in 2008, the total food bought in all three countries was about 100% which was 1.5 times that of other items.
- Some people believe that there are things individuals can do to help prevent global climate change, other believe that just government and large business which can make a difference. Discuss 84
- The diagrams below show the development of a small fishing village and its surrounding area into a large European tourist resort. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- International community must ensure that all countries reduce the consumption of fossil fuels such as gas and oil. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- With increasing populations and ever growing urban centers many countries are losing their natural beauty spots What are benefits of protecting places for natural beauty spots How can it be solved 93
- The diagrams below show the development of a small fishing village and its surrounding area into a large European tourist resort. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
he given bar charts compare the proportion...
^^
Line 1, column 4, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[1]
Message: Possible grammatical error. You used a past participle without using any required verb ('be' or 'have'). Did you mean 'gave'?
Suggestion: gave
he given bar charts compare the proportion of fo...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 125, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... living in Norway, Poland and UK in two period of time 1998 and 2008. Overall, it is clear th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 975.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77941176471 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59736857789 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549019607843 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.9844396019 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.333333333 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227493333215 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10261571433 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0863012562464 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157346768753 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599933462408 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.