The given graph shows the consumption of fast food in the UK (per week) from 1970 to 1990.
The line graph compares the amount of Hamburger, Fish & Chips, Pizza eaten weekly in the UK between 1970 and 1990.
It is clear from the line graph that the quantity of Fish & Chips consumed weekly experienced the most dramatic change during the research period. Additionally, while the consumption of Hamburger and Fish & Chips increased, there was a significant decrease in the figure for Pizza.
In 1970, the proportion of pizza consumed per week was highest, at around 300 grams, while the consumption of Pizza was significantly lower at only about 30 grams. Meanwhile, approximately 80 grams of Fish & Chips were eaten by the UK. In 1985, Pizza consumption sharply rose and reached the lowest point of 200 grams, whereas the other two figures climbed gradually.
In 1990, the consumption of Fish & Chips rose dramatically to 500 grams and became highest figure in the line graph, while hamburger's figure experienced a slight rise to nearly about 300 grams. At the same time the amount of pizza eaten weekly remained at roughly 200 grams.
- The graphs below provide information on global population figures and figures for urban populations in different world regions. 73
- The charts below show the results of a survey about what people of different age groups say makes them most happy. 61
- The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009. 78
- The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket. 67
- The map below is of the town of Canterbury. A new school (S) is planned for the area. The map shows two possible sites for the school. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 77, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'became the highest'.
Suggestion: became the highest
...hips rose dramatically to 500 grams and became highest figure in the line graph, while hamburg...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 871.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06395348837 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71766094251 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563953488372 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0131556175 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.875 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199473674242 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0939365607898 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649107567918 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145886324446 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557445597829 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.