The given graph shows the consumption of fast food in the UK (per week) from 1970 to 1990.

The data given in the graph display the amount of fast foods expenditure in Britain from 1970 to 1990. To put in a nutshell, there was an ascending trend in the figures of Fish & Chips and Hamburger; meanwhile, the statistic of pizza followed a descending tendency over the period surveyed in the question.

It is clear that Pizza was the most popular food in the UK with 300 grams in 1970 while the opposite was true for Hamburger. For the next 15 years, Britain underwent a dramatic increment of nearly 400 grams from about 100 grams to 500 grams in the figure of Fish & Chips while there was a strong escalation of 260 grams from around 20 grams to approximately 280 grams in the statistic of Hamburger. What is worth noting that the Pizza consumption fell gradually by 100 grams from 300 grams to the lowest point of 200 grams from 1970 to 1985.

In 1990, Fish & Chips became the most consumed fast food while Pizza was the least common in the UK.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 56, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'foods'' or 'food's'?
Suggestion: foods'; food's
...in the graph display the amount of fast foods expenditure in Britain from 1970 to 199...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 344, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion of 260 grams from around 20 grams to approximately 280 grams in the statistic...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 782.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.52023121387 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40520162039 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531791907514 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 213.3 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.4386365429 43.030603864 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.333333333 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8333333333 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.833333333333 5.23603664747 16% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217660915759 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145908121757 0.103423049105 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134426053676 0.0843802449381 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173618811425 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485434852362 0.0819641961636 59% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 76.9 61.2550243902 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.53 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.