Should rich countries pay more for environmental damage?
The Earth becomes older time by time. The environmental damage has also accelerated its demolition. Humans are considered responsible for this problem. I personally support he statement that rich countries should pay more for the environmental damage, but on the other side, there is also a reason why they should not.
On the one hand, rich countries are high responsible for the environmental damage because they obtain profit from the utilization of their natural resources implemented in industrial factories. Many researchers and environmentalists who support this statement believe that the great number of factories in the rich countries contribute to the environmental damage. Their belief is supported by a proof that these factories create pollutions to water, air, or soil. The companies whose factories are blamed for this usually do not have a good environmental management system. They also merely have a little budget allocation for the environment. The government of these rich countries do not notice that their industry development not only gives much profit but also puts them as the suspect of environmental damage. According to these reasons, I agree that the rich countries are responsible for environmental damage and have to pay more.
On the other hand, I argue that the rich countries should not pay more for the environmental damage. These countries became rich from the proper utilization of natural resources and supporting of a good environmental management. The Earth dwellers should thank them because of some reasons. Firstly, these countries produce useful commodities for humanity life. Their factories contribute to the development of human’s way of living. Secondly, they can manage and minimize the pollutions derived from their factories. They always evaluate the cleanliness of water, air, and soil in their countries. Thirdly, they decrease the deposit of in the Earth by using 3R methods which are reuse the waste for valuable usage, reduce the poisonous and dangerous sustances in their waste, and recycle the waste as additional material for their facctories.
In conclusion, it seems to me that there are rich countries which should pay more as their responsibilty for environmental damage, and there are which should be regarded for their contribution to keep the environment.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2013-08-02 | mikrarlagowa | 68 | view |
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of 73
- Telecommuting refers to workers doing their jobs from home for part of each week and communicating with their office using computer technology Telecommuting is growing in many countries and is expected to be common for most office workers in the coming de 88
- The three pie chart below show the changes in annual spending by particular UK school in 1981, 1991, and 2001.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 75
- The chart and table show the number fishers in millions for different regions between 1970 1980 and 2000 and the world s top ten exporters of fish in 2000 Summarize the information by choosing and reporting the key features an maka any relevant comparison 80
- The two graphs below show the percentage of smokes and the consumption of alcohol in litres in selected countries for the period 1960 2000 Summarize the information by choosing and reporting the key features and make any relevant comparisons 84
Comments
It is not too bad. I want you
It is not too bad.
I want you to pay particular attention to your a concluding paragraph.
It might be a good idea to read my samples of essays. Then, peruse a score of 8, or more. Best of luck.
On the one hand, rich countries are high responsible for
Suggestion: On the one hand, rich countries are highly responsible for
Sentence: Thirdly, they decrease the deposit of in the Earth by using 3R methods which are reuse the waste for valuable usage, reduce the poisonous and dangerous sustances in their waste, and recycle the waste as additional material for their facctories.
Description: The token of is not usually followed by a preposition
Suggestion: Refer to of and in
Description: The fragment reuse the waste is not usually preceded by are
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace are with is
Sentence: Thirdly, they decrease the deposit of in the Earth by using 3R methods which are reuse the waste for valuable usage, reduce the poisonous and dangerous sustances in their waste, and recycle the waste as additional material for their facctories.
Error: sustances Suggestion: substances
Error: facctories Suggestion: factories
Sentence: In conclusion, it seems to me that there are rich countries which should pay more as their responsibilty for environmental damage, and there are which should be regarded for their contribution to keep the environment.
Error: responsibilty Suggestion: responsibility
flaws:
No. of Different Words: 164 200
Don't support and against your own idea in one essay. Better support just one side.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 3 2
No. of Sentences: 20 15
No. of Words: 362 350
No. of Characters: 1922 1500
No. of Different Words: 164 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.362 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.309 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.004 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 135 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 100 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 79 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 69 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.1 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.439 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.45 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.32 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.46 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.111 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5