The chart below shows the amount spent on six consumer goods in four European countries.
The chart below lets us compare the amount spent on six different consumer goods, to be more precise, personal stereos, tennis racquets, perfumes, CD's, toys and photographic films in four European countries.
It is clearly visible from the table that Britain has always significantly differed from other countries for the amount spent on given consumer goods. Meanwhile, in France most consumers prefer to spent their money on photographic films, than other goods indicated on the given information.
The amount spent on toys in Italy and France are equal, but in most cases the indicators of Italy are bigger than France, except on photographic films and CDs. Refer to chart, it is evident that in Germany people do not show great interest to consume such goods as consumers of other European countries.
The major conclusion that can be drawn using this graph is that there are great differencies among the choices of residents in given countries.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2014-01-12 | friday1004 | 70 | view |
2013-11-10 | Tohir Bin Umar Irfa'i | 55 | view |
2013-09-03 | ariel1984 | 67 | view |
2013-08-21 | fialka | 57 | view |
- Describe the bar chart given below illustrating the percentages of the Internet users between males and females in 2008 88
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 90
- Compare the advantages and disadvantages of media for communicating information. 57
- The chart below shows amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain. The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 70
- This graph illustrates the number of Chinese, Korean and Indian students who enrolled at Rice University over a five year period. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 80
flaws:
No. of Words: 155 200
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 6 10
No. of Words: 155 200
No. of Characters: 776 1000
No. of Different Words: 92 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.528 4.0
Average Word Length: 5.006 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.549 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 49 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 37 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 27 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 18 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 25.833 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 3.625 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.167 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.499 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.82 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.131 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4