The chart below shows the amount spent on six consumer goods in four European countries.
The chart below lets us compare the amount spent on six different consumer goods, to be more precise, personal stereos, tennis racquets, perfumes, CD's, toys and photographic films in four European countries.
It is clearly visible from the table that Britain has always significantly differed from other countries for the amount spent on given consumer goods. Meanwhile, in France most consumers prefer to spent their money on photographic films, than other goods indicated on the given information.
The amount spent on toys in Italy and France are equal, but in most cases the indicators of Italy are bigger than France, except on photographic films and CDs. Refer to chart, it is evident that in Germany people do not show great interest to consume such goods as consumers of other European countries.
The major conclusion that can be drawn using this graph is that there are great differencies among the choices of residents in given countries.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2014-01-12 | friday1004 | 70 | view |
2013-11-10 | Tohir Bin Umar Irfa'i | 55 | view |
2013-09-03 | ariel1984 | 67 | view |
2013-08-21 | fialka | 57 | view |
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 87
- Compare the advantages and disadvantages of media for communicating information. 57
- This graph illustrates the number of Chinese, Korean and Indian students who enrolled at Rice University over a five year period. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 80
- The pie-charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and france in 1980 and 2000. 90
- The only way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities is by reducing the need for people to travel from home for work, education or shopping. 75
flaws:
No. of Words: 155 200
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 6 10
No. of Words: 155 200
No. of Characters: 776 1000
No. of Different Words: 92 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.528 4.0
Average Word Length: 5.006 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.549 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 49 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 37 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 27 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 18 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 25.833 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 3.625 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.167 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.499 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.82 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.131 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4