Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extend do you agree or disagree?
What other measures do you think might be effective?
To date, traffic jams and pollution in urban areas are getting big thread for the life. Moreover, a number of solutions to these kinds of problems are proposed by a variety of groups. Some consider that increasing the price of petrol is the best way in order to lessen traffic and pollution.
To begin with, it is a clear fact that increasing petrol prices affect whole economy in different ways. For example, if government decide to raise the cost of petrol, it will cause inflation, in other words it will bring about increasing prices of all things. Consequently, in that case either people’s life standards will decrease or the salaries will be augmented. As it is seen, increasing the prices of petrol will never change the current situation, in fact it will impact the economy in bad ways.
To my mind, the best way to solve traffic and pollution problem is using the power of sustainable energy. If governments allocate money for sustainable resources, there will not be pollution problems again. Especially using sustainable energy in order to gear vehicles will revolutionize traffic system. At the same time, education and media can help to tackle these troubles more effectively. As a result, people must be aware of current problems and they must be taught the ways to fight against these problems.
To sum up, I strongly believe that raising prices of petrol will never be solution to the traffic or pollution. If we want not to hear of pollution and traffic problems again, we have to find more rational ways, such as education, using of sustainable energy and so on.
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sport facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.Discuss both these views and give you 72
- News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers. What factors do you think influence these decisions? Do we become used to bad news? Would it be better if more good news was reported? 68
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 50
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves? 80
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the business department of the Apogee Company:“When the Apogee Company had all its operations in one location, it was more profitable than it is today. Therefore, the Apogee Company should close down its field 83
Sentence: For example, if government decide to raise the cost of petrol, it will cause inflation, in other words it will bring about increasing prices of all things.
Description: The fragment government decide to is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace decide with verb, past tense
there will not be pollution problems again.
Suggestion: there will be no pollution problems again.
flaws:
Sentence Length SD: 4.697 7.5
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.051 0.07
No. of Different Words: 142 200
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 270 350
No. of Characters: 1278 1500
No. of Different Words: 142 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.054 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.733 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.571 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 90 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 63 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 46 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 29 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.286 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.697 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.643 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.337 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.563 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.051 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5