Some people think Governments should take measures regarding the healthy lifestyle of individuals. Others think it must be managed by individuals. Discuss both sides and give your opinion
It has been claimed that in this contemproray world health is not concerned as a major. Many human kinds think that officials should apply diverse methods to better healthy lifestyle of individuals, while ani-advocates suggest that keeping healthy is only in citizens response. In my aspects of illustration, this issue is becoming more indisputable than were in the past. The two controversial reflection of this argument will be analyzed below before a reasoned conclusion is drawn.
Firstly, government should create more opportunities for people to continue healthy lifestyle. For example, building well-equipped sport facilities and health centres can be appropriate overcome from side of officials. Additionally, special sport trainings such as jogging, running and warm-up exercisises are esteblesheb in western countries before the working proccess is started in order to make mental and physical condition balanced. Besides that, in some countries, companies allocate some time for having rest(for sleeping) during work proccess but in limited period as it is proved to be beneficial because it preserves employees from insonia. Therefore,officials make contribution to the life of citizens, especially, in the terms of health care.
However, individuals should to be a responsiable for their health. Because controlling a car is on drivers' hand as it has been enrolled. For example, articles about balanced diet are presented in many magazines and journals. Additionally, domestic easy daily exercises are recommended in these sources. Besides that, being healthy is clarified by how responsiable and punctual the person is,significantly, in doing sport activities daily. Thus, mainly people are liable in their healthy lifestyle.
In conclusion, It is clear from the arguments above that both sides have a reasonable evedence. However, individuals contribute more to health than governments do. Every person should approach different to health, comming from their own weakness
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2017-05-04 | miladpouya | 73 | view |
2019-03-16 | vishalsanzira | 56 | view |
- A gift (such as a camera, a soccer ball, or an animal) can contribute to a child’s development. What gift would you give to help a child develop? Why? Use reasons and specific examples to support your choice. 67
- The bar chart below shows shares of expenditures for five major categories in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Japan in the year 2009. 78
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree? 61
- Advances in science and technology and other areas of society in the last 100 years have transformed the way we live as well as postponing the day we die There is no better time to be alive than now To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinio 91
- The graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in five countries. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 660, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , officials
...serves employees from insonia. Therefore,officials make contribution to the life of citize...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 391, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , significantly
... responsiable and punctual the person is,significantly, in doing sport activities daily. Thus,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1700.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.76271186441 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20127452355 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637288135593 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.6378117792 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4444444444 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3888888889 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170256997143 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0449983091961 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517567894995 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0938671763284 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.022669285158 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.83 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.