The charts below show the main methods of transportation for people travelling to one university for work or study in 2004 and 2009.
The pie charts compare the difference in the means of transport for people who travel to a specific university for the purpose of study and work in 2004 and 2009.
Overall, it is evident from the given charts that the significant changes were seen at three out of five modes of transport, namely: bus, bicycle, and car. Furthermore, while car was by far the most favorable mean in the first year examined, after 5 years, people tended to select bus as their main mode to reach their destination.
In 2004, just above a half of staff and students who travelled to this university chose to go by car, followed by bus, which made up 33 per cent of total methods of transportation. Conversely, people were not keen on travelling by bicycle, walking, and train, which could be proved by their relatively smaller figures (at 9,4,and 3 per cent, respectively).
After a half decade, the proportion of people decided to commute by bus increased sharply to 46 per cent, which could attribute to the new bus stop at this university in 2006. The similar trend could also be observed in the rate of bicycle users (nearly doubled that in 2004), train passengers, and pedestrians (rose marginally by 1 to 2 per cent). In contrast, due to the changes of car parking in 2008, the percentage of people enjoying traveling by car to this university witnessed a spectatular drop to 28 per cent.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-19 | Chen ni | 84 | view |
| 2020-09-02 | Harkirat Kaur123 | 82 | view |
| 2020-02-04 | nguyenphthao99@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | Szprawstyle | 82 | view |
| 2019-03-14 | Dhillon Simran | 73 | view |
- What are the benefits and drawbacks of keeping animals in zoos 75
- The table below shows the income and expenditure of Harckley Hall, a public place for hiring over the period of three years. 84
- THe chart below shows the percentage of difference in income between men and women from 1978 to 2008. 78
- This table shows how many people in millions used different form public transport in Milan between 2010 and 2014 72
- The chart below gives information about the percentage of the adult population who were overweight in four different countries in 1980 1990 and 2000 72
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, furthermore, if, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1141.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73443983402 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74462430703 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 106.607317073 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601659751037 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 340.2 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 7.51248960066 43.030603864 17% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 142.625 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.125 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.625 5.23603664747 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255765474353 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119768594825 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.154738402966 0.0843802449381 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198150341815 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.189041005013 0.0819641961636 231% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.75 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.