Space exploration is much too expensive and the money should be spent on more important things.
Do you agree or disagree?
It is a given fact that space exploration is consuming much of the government’s coffers. Although some people believe that it rather be spent on immediate problems here on earth, I find it hard to agree with their notion.
Space exploration squanders too much of our tax money, according to some people. They attest that it is frivolous and the resources to it should be directed to more important concerns like poverty alleviation and environmental conservation. They also conclude that it is utter nonsense to venture or explore out of our planet while the planet itself is suffering, and fixing it first should be the first priority and given utmost importance.
Even though other people do not revolt to this idea, it is clear to me that it never fails to deliver new information as well as scientific advancement regardless of its steep price. Firstly, satellites orbiting above the atmosphere will not be possible without the efforts of space exploration research. The satellites peer through our world, giving scientists and us common citizens up-to-date information about the weather patterns and forecasts and tectonic plate movement. Other than that, we will be ignorant about our celestial neighbors in the system. Since they have untapped natural resources, the advancement of space exploration can give way to us to mine these resources to supply our ailing world nearly devoid of its own from our exploitation.
All in all, although space exploration’s steep price tag convinced a considerable number of people believing its resources should be directed to more important matters, I remain biased against their conclusion about it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-01-07 | kim_fransiskus | 52 | view |
| 2018-01-07 | ananbahrulkhoir | 93 | view |
| 2018-01-07 | kimfransiskus | 73 | view |
- When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try to keep them alive. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 67
- Space exploration is much too expensive and the money should be spent on more important things.Do you agree or disagree? 78
- Do the dangers derived from the use of chemicals in food production and preservation outweigh the advantages?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.Write at least 250 words. 56
- The pie charts show the electricity generated in Germany and France from all sources and renewables in 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 Words 67
- As most people spend a major part of their adult life at work, job satisfaction is an important element of individual well-being.What factors contribute to job satisfaction? How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1402.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29056603774 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01068702841 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.615094339623 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5594123618 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.454545455 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0909090909 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.81818181818 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270025346516 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0997071617613 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661809100325 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16403210833 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565631757904 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.