In the future, it seems more difficult to live on the Earth. Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planet to live, such as Mars.To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

In the future, it seems more difficult to live on the Earth. Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planet to live, such as Mars.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is argue that people should spent more money on finding other place outside the Earth to live because the survival on the Earth will be limited and difficult to live. I completely agree with this view.
To begin with, there are a variety of reasons why it will be more difficult to live on the Earth. Firstly, nowadays, more and more company and industry zones have been discharging chemical waste into rives, causing death to many fish and other aquatic animals, which leads to the lack of clean water for people. Secondly, ozone layer depletion has the effect of allowing harmful radiation from the sun to penetrate the atmostphere and this increases the rick of skin cancer. Additionally, it is possible to acheive sustainable development on the Earth because many other environmental problems.
On the other hand, it is enable to research other planets to live and people should pour more money into space researchs. Alien life forms can exist on the other planets, this proves that people also can live normally outside of the Earth. With morden technology, discovering the mysteries of the universe and finding a new area to live is achievable.
In conclusion, I believe that it is impossible to solve numourous problems of the Earth in the future and it is essential to spent a large of money on researching other planets to live.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (3 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-13 hana99 73 view
2019-11-21 vantran2297 89 view
2019-10-15 Vu Thi Hoang Ngan 84 view
2018-11-26 dungha23 73 view
2018-02-21 sho2501 89 view
Essays by user bennk2020 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'argued'.
Suggestion: argued
It is argue that people should spent more money on ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 26, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'enabled'.
Suggestion: enabled
...al problems. On the other hand, it is enable to research other planets to live and p...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1115.0 1615.20841683 69% => OK
No of words: 229.0 315.596192385 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86899563319 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61198163939 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 176.041082164 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550218340611 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 359.1 506.74238477 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3917348315 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.5 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.398367127108 0.244688304435 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156164332116 0.084324248473 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127087012559 0.0667982634062 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262943956569 0.151304729494 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.076005107212 0.056905535591 134% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.